This blog deals with issues relating to politics, Geopolitics, Finance, Banking and anything which interests me.
WOLF: GOP should fear voters, not the ‘fiscal cliff’ -- Keep fingerprints off Obama’s tax hikes
How many times does Lucy have to pull away the football before Charlie Brown finally wises up and quits playing her game?
don’t have to keep falling for the Democrats’ duplicity. The Democrats
pretend the so-called “fiscal cliff” debate is about getting our
financial house in order, so they propose a tax increase on people
earning more than $200,000 a year (i.e., “millionaires and billionaires”
in Democrat-speak), which will fund their leviathan government for all
of — drumroll — four days.
These are pathologically unserious
people. Their goal is not to solve the current fiscal crisis. Their goal
is to use the crisis to grow government and further their statist
agenda which, incidentally, created the crisis in the first place.
Recall Democrat Rahm Emanuel’s unmasked moment of clarity: “You never
want a serious crisis to go to waste.”
Now, in hopes of enacting
their panacea of tax increases, Democrats offer spending cuts that
everyone knows never will happen. What’s worse, the president calls for
$255 billion in more spending. Only a Democrat would claim increased
spending will reduce the deficit, and only a Republican would fall for
The Democrats’ lust for tax increases goes far beyond simple
class warfare, as atrocious as that alone is. Democrats are fully aware
that the rich already are paying more than their fair share. The wealthy
(top 10 percent) may earn 50 percent of the income, but they pay 70
percent of the federal taxes. If that’s not fair, what is? Eighty
percent? One hundred percent?
The Democrats’ long game is to push
an ever-increasing tax burden onto fewer and fewer taxpayers. This grows
a class of Americans who may or may not earn paychecks but certainly
become beneficiaries of government largesse while remaining blissfully
detached from its enormous cost. (What’s their fair share?) Economists
would call this a recipe for disaster. Democrats would call it a voting
base. Weak-kneed Republicans are poised to help them build it.
will follow is just as predictable: The economy will continue to
suffer, the debt will continue to rise, and Democrats will blame
Republicans. Why play their game? Republicans must reject compromises
that (1) only hope to slow the Democrats’ inexorable march toward
statism and (2) absolve Democrats from blame. One Republican vote is all
the cover they need.
The Republicans understood this in the
run-up to Obamacare. Outnumbered and unable to stop this disaster, they
at least were smart enough to stay away from it. They could have
“compromised” in hopes of making it slightly less disastrous, but that’s
a fool’s errand. Just ask former Rep. Bart Stupak, whose abortion
compromise failed to protect the unborn or his job.
squarely own health care. They can’t blame Republicans for this one.
Your insurance rates went up? Thank a Democrat. Your doctor no longer
takes Medicare? Thank a Democrat. Your company cut your hours back to
part time in order to avoid Obamacare penalties? Thank a Democrat.
for the “fiscal cliff” debate, let the Democrats own it. Republicans
would be foolish to compromise with Democrats, whose real goal is to
grow the non-taxpayer class by shifting the tax burden onto fewer and
fewer voters. This is exactly what a tax increase on “the rich” does. It
would be far better to allow all of the George W. Bush tax cuts to
expire than to play into the Democrats’ hands. The economy will suffer
either way, and Republicans will be blamed either way — that’s a given —
but the Democrats finally will be exposed.
The left has railed
against the “Bush tax cuts for the rich” for a decade. (Start preparing
those YouTube video montages now.) Democrats’ dishonesty will be fully
exposed, as the typical middle-class family of four who once bought into
the anti-Bush mythology sees their taxes go up by $2,200. If the Bush
tax cuts were only for the rich, the difference must be what we’ll call
the Obama tax hikes.
Democrats hate the Bush tax cuts on a
visceral level. In their minds, those cuts caused the recession,
exploded the debt and are the root of all evil. If undoing them makes
things worse — and it will — Democrats have some serious explaining to
do. If Republicans aren’t up to winning that debate, it’s time to
It would be far better to let the Democrats own this
disaster than to put a GOP stamp of approval on it. Republicans would
be foolish — as Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist puts
it — to “have their fingerprints on the murder weapon.” Dr. Milton R. Wolf, a Washington Times columnist, is a radiologist and President Obama’s cousin. He blogs at miltonwolf.com.
By Sikander Hayat I wanted to share an experience with you guys. I needed to apply for a Pakistani visa and went online to see what the process was to get the visa. My search took me to the website of the Pakistan high commissioner in London. This website stated that Pakistan High Commission in London and other high commissions have stopped processing visa applications and that all applications are now dealt though Gerry’s Visa Services. I went on this website and it gave the addresses of different offices in United Kingdom. I chose the Bradford office, which I thought was the easiest one to get to 80 miles but still nearer than anything else. I got my docs ready, signed & dated everything and left home at 6:00 am to get there on time for 9:00 am as same day visa service is provided between 9:00 am and 11:00 am. I got there right on time at 9:00 and after spending some time in looking for parking, I went in. There was only two more people in the office as customers. There were thr…
Balochistan is not getting resolved and there are no signs that it will get anywhere near resolution in near to medium term. Looking from the Baloch militant's point of view, it is very clear that they are not getting their goals nor there is any hope of achieving them. They are disrupting the march of advancement in Baloch dominated areas of the province and killing both frontier corps and ethnically non Baloch residents of the province. In all this killing, there is an exception and that exception is of Baloch militants not touching the Pashtuns of the province. According to Wikipedia, Balochistan is only 50% Baloch and the rest is mostly Pashtun with other smaller ethnicities making up the rest of the population. If they start fighting Pashtuns, they know they will be routed and without taking on the Pashtun they cannot achieve there goal, which is primarily to make the province a Baloch dominated land. This is a catch twenty two situation and a conundrum tha…
The areas comprising the state of Pakistan have a rich history and are steeped in the traditions of martial kind. Tribes which are the foundation stone of Pakistan come from all ethnic groups of Pakistan either they be Sindhi, Balochi, Pathan or Punjabi. One of these men of war & honour were Mir Chakar Khan Rind. He is probably the most famous leader coming out of Baloch ethnic group of Pakistan.
Mir Chakar Khan Rind or Chakar-i-Azam (1468 – 1565 ) was a Baloch king and ruler of Satghara in (Southern Pakistani Punjab) in the 15th century. He is considered a folk hero of the Baloch people and an important figure in the Baloch epic Hani and Sheh Mureed.
Mir Chakar lived in Sibi in the hills of Balochistan and became the head of Rind tribe at the age of 18 after the death of his father Mir Shahak Khan. Mir Chakar's kingdom was short lived because of a civil war between the Lashari and Rind tribes of Balochistan. Mir Chakar and Mir Gwaharam Khan Lashari, head of…