Well, the Mayans were sort of right.
The world didn’t implode when their calendar stopped on Dec. 21. But the
National Rifle Association did call for putting guns in every American
school in a press conference that had a sort of
civilization-hits-a-dead-end feel to it.
And we learned that negotiations on averting a major economic crisis had
come to a screeching halt because Speaker John Boehner lost the support
of the far-right contingent of his already-pretty-damned-conservative
caucus. We have seen the future, and everything involves negotiating
with loony people.
Wayne LaPierre, the C.E.O. of the N.R.A., has major sway in Congress
when it comes to gun issues. So the press conference, in which he read a
rambling, unyielding statement in a quavering voice, while refusing to
take any questions, could not have inspired confidence that the national
trauma over the shooting at a Connecticut elementary school was going
to be resolved anytime soon.
LaPierre immediately identified the problem that led to a deranged young
man mowing down children with a semiautomatic rifle: Gun-free school
zones. (“They tell every insane killer in America that schools are the
safest place to inflict maximum mayhem.”) Then he demanded a police
officer in every American school. Or maybe a program to recruit armed
volunteers.
At around the same time he was speaking, a gunman in Pennsylvania killed
three people after shooting up a rural church. We will await the next
grand plan for arming ministers.
The idea that having lots of guns around is the best protection against
gun violence is a fairy tale that the N.R.A. tells itself when it goes
to sleep at night. But an armed security officer at Columbine High School was no help. And history also shows that armed civilians
generally freeze up during mass shootings — for good reason, since
usually the only way a crazed gunman gets stopped is when he runs out of
ammunition. So what we continue to have is an excellent argument for
banning weapons that spray lots of bullets.
However unhinged LaPierre might have seemed to the casual observer, he
sent a clear message to members of Congress who fear the wrath of the
N.R.A.: No compromise on banning assault weapons or any gun control
issue. That made it hard to imagine any reform getting past the great,
gaping maw that is the House of Representatives.
We witnessed the magic of the House Republican majority when the Tea
Party forces blocked Boehner’s plan to continue the Bush tax cuts for
incomes under $1 million a year. This was around the time the speaker
recited the prayer, much beloved by 12-step programs, about seeking the
serenity to accept things you cannot change.
Boehner’s bill was mainly a political ploy, so in a way, its defeat was
meaningless. Except that it would be comforting not to believe that one
of the critical players in Washington was always at the mercy of the
loopy-extremist wing in his caucus.
Like, um, Representative Tim Huelskamp of Kansas. On Friday, Huelskamp
represented the House resistance forces on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” in an
appearance with great Mayan overtones. First, he gradually acknowledged
that he was never going to vote for anything that raised taxes on
anybody, even if it was understood by the entire world to be a
negotiating tactic to win massive spending cuts, and avert massive tax
increases on 99.8 percent of the population.
Then the discussion turned to the Connecticut shootings, and Huelskamp
quickly announced that the nation did not have a gun problem. “It’s a
people problem. It’s a culture problem,” he insisted. Anybody who
disagreed — like President Obama — was, he said, using a tragedy “to
push a political agenda.”
In conclusion, the congressman announced that he had an 11-year-old son,
“and I have a choice whether he’s allowed to play those video games.
What I would suggest to moms and dads across this country is look at
what your children are doing. ... And I’m not saying to pass a single
law about that, because I think that would be politicizing the issue.”
Which we really hate. Politicizing.
There are so many ways we’d rather be celebrating the holidays. We would
like to be gathering around the tree with loved ones, discussing
current events in the form of that story about the theft of 6 million
pounds of syrup from the strategic maple syrup reserve in Quebec.
But we are where we are. President Obama bid a Merry Christmas to the
nation after announcing that he would try to re-avert the feared “fiscal
cliff” with a bill that resolves virtually nothing but avoiding tax
increases for the middle class. “At the very least, let’s agree right
now on what we already agree on,” he said. This is what currently passes
for a wildly optimistic statement.
Meanwhile, a congressman from Wisconsin, angry about the failure to pass
a farm bill, warned that the nation was about to fall over “the Dairy
Cliff.”
At least there’s still eggnog. God bless us every one.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for leaving comments. You are making this discussion richer and more beneficial to everyone. Do not hold back.