Skip to main content

Demography of Kashmir - Can India Change Kashmir To A Muslim Minority State?

By Sikander Hayat

Kashmir is slowly being gobbled up by India by ethinic cleansing and population transfer from the rest of India to Kashmir. Pakistan’s options are limited in terms of taking it back from India through an open armed conflict given the disparity between the two countries in terms of economy and resources. Pakistan can only play a long game by improving its economy, get richer, have good relations with richer/influential nations and wait for the Kashmiris to fight for their right of self determination

Pakistan has made some good progress in terms of constitutional clarity for the people of Gilgit Balistan and Azad Kashmir both of which are effectively now fifth and sixth provinces of Pakistan. Azad Kashmir is now a semi autonomous region with its own President (Masood Khan) , Prime Minister (Raja Farooq Haider Khan) and Supreme Court. Azad Kashmir has its own constitution to provide international clarity in terms of status of Indian occupied Kashmir vis a vis Azad Kashmir and eventual withdrawal of Indian army from the occupied Kashmir and its merger with Azad Kashmir. 



Gilgit Baltistan is a completely different matter as it is and always was part of mainland Pakistan and it has been granted the status of the fifth province of Pakistan with seats in Pakistan’s national assembly and Senate. This status will stay until the Indian army withdraws from Indian Occupied Kashmir at which point a new status may be established. Gilgit Baltistan has a directly elected Chief Minister (Khalid Khurshid Khan) who was directed in provincial general elections in 2020. Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Kashmir are the major beneficiaries of the CPEC project which connects China with the Arabian Sea through Gwadar and Karachi. Major construction projects have been initiated in Azad Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan to lift up the economic prosperity of the two regions.  



At the moment, situation of Indian occupied kashmir is bleak in terms of the status of its muslim majority. Indian occupied kashmir may not have a muslim majority for very long as Indian government is taking steps to make Kashmir a Hindu majority state to quell the aspirations of Kashmiris once and for all. Steps taken by Indian occupation establishment are as follows but not limited to the below list:


  1. Any Indian can buy land in Kashmir. This replicates the Israeli tactics of occupation and annexation in Palestine

  2. Any Indian can get domicile in Kashmir to give equal rights vis a vis Kashmiris. 

  3. Status of Kashmir has been downgraded to a territory controlled by Indian government directly without any local legislature. 

  4. Kashmir has been divided into two territories of Ladakh and Jammu & Kashmir. 

  5. Indian appointed governor currently runs the show in Kashmir. 

  6. Number of Indian occupation troops has been increased to levels so high that currently there is one soldier for every seven Kashmiris in the occupied territory. 



It is the policy of Indian occupation government to convert the Kashmir into a muslim minority state in next ten years. Kashmir will lose its national character, its local population and its muslim heritage. The question is if Indian occupation regime can achieve this goal?

With Pakistan struggling economically, it is a very distinct possibility that Indian occupation regime will achieve all or most of its goals in Kashmir and local kashmiris will be marginalised forever. BJP (the hindu nationalist ruling party of India) has not only made Kashmir a living hell for the Muslims but Muslims living in other parts of India are increasingly being lynched by hindu mobs under the auspices of BJP.  BJP’s goal is to make India a Hindu Rashtra (A hindu theocratic regime with apartheid for Muslims).



They are changing the name of every city in India which sounds Muslim. They are rewriting the history of India to expunge every muslim achivment and they portray Muslim heros as villians. This is all happening under the auspices of so called western liberal democracies which only see India as a huge market to sell to and as a defence against Chinese aspirations. It is time for western nations and only others who claim to fight for the human rights to wake up and tell india that ethinic genocide is unacceptable. They need to take a stand but they will not as realpolitik dictates that India must be propped up against China and contain China within the local region. 



Related Posts:


  1. WHY IS INDIA TRYING TO DESTROY PAKISTAN?  


  1. WHY IS INDIA FUNDING TERROR IN BALOCHISTAN , FATA & KARACHI?


  1. AZAD KASHMIR & GILGIT BALTISTAN - TIME FOR PAKISTAN TO TAKE UNILATERAL ACTION


  1. WHO CAN BRIDGE THE RURAL, URBAN & ETHNIC POLITICAL DIVIDE IN PAKISTAN?


  1. INDIA & AFGHANISTAN - PAKISTAN'S SECURITY INTERESTS IN AFGHANISTAN


  1. WHY PAKISTAN CHINA NUCLEAR DEAL IS IMPORTANT FOR FUTURE PROSPERITY OF PAKISTAN


  1. THE KILLING FIELDS OF KASHMIR – INDIAN BRUTALITY CANNOT EXTINGUISH THE FLAME OF AZADI (FREEDOM)


  1. SHAHRUKH KHAN SHOULD MOVE TO PAKISTAN!!! – THE TRUE FACE OF INDIA’S SECULARISM


  1. AZAD KASHMIR - IS CHINA TAKING EXTRA INTEREST IN KASHMIR?


  1. IS THERE A NEED FOR MORE PROVINCES IN PAKISTAN? WHAT ARE THE FUTURE OPTIONS FOR PAKISTAN?




HOME 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...