Skip to main content

Putin Tries to Soothe Anxious Russians


By ANDREW OSBORN

MOSCOW -- Prime Minister Vladimir Putin cast himself as a troubleshooting father-of-the-nation figure in a televised appearance that analysts said was designed to calm poorer Russians spooked by the financial crisis.

Mr. Putin reveled in the state-media limelight, joking, comforting the unemployed and promising a new dress to a little girl who phoned in to the question-and-answer session, an exercise that was a hallmark of his presidency, which ended earlier this year.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin struck a fatherly tone in a question-and-answer session on national television on Thursday. Left, viewers in Grozny, Chechnya, and at right, in Moscow.

Mr. Putin was reaching out to low-income Russians, said political analyst Gleb Pavlovsky -- an audience he said the prime minister connects with better than his successor, Dmitry Medvedev. "People needed this [the crisis] explained to them," Mr. Pavlovsky said.

Mr. Putin also ruled out a return to the Kremlin before 2012, scotching speculation that Mr. Medvedev would be a temporary fixture. A move earlier this year to amend the constitution and extend the presidential term for future leaders to six years from four fueled speculation that Mr. Putin wants his old job back. On Thursday, Mr. Putin dismissed that idea -- at least in the short term.

"The next election is in 2012," he said. "We will have to get through to that time, then we will see."

Mr. Putin called his political partnership with Mr. Medvedev "very effective." His own role as premier and leader of the ruling United Russia party allowed him to get legislation through parliament rapidly, a boon at a time of crisis, he added.

During the phone-in, which lasted three hours and was broadcast live on state TV and radio, Mr. Putin mentioned Mr. Medvedev only once. His own performance topped evening news bulletins. Mr. Medvedev, who is on a visit to India, got much sparser coverage.

Supporters said Mr. Putin spoke as national leader, and that his remit is broader than that of a normal Russian premier. "Defense and foreign policy are technically the responsibility of the president," said Sergei Markov, a pro-Kremlin lawmaker. "But Mr. Putin said a lot on both."

The prime minister said he hoped strained U.S.-Russia relations would improve under Barack Obama, and critiqued Ukraine for overdue gas payments.

Though the session appeared to be carefully stage-managed, there was no obvious attempt to paper over the financial crisis, which state media has repeatedly played down.

The first person to call said he had a young family and was jobless. "What are we supposed to do?" he asked. A somber Mr. Putin, unfazed by that and similar questions, detailed government measures to help, including increases in welfare checks. Russia's gold and foreign-currency reserves, the world's third largest, would ensure "a soft landing," he added. He stressed that the crisis was a global phenomenon that had started in the U.S. And he didn't pretend it would be short-lived, saying most experts thought a recovery would only happen in spring 2010.

Comments

  1. With no transition arrangement in place, it will be total chaos in Russia when Putin leaves the stage.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Putin has taken offence at Fox News Bill O'Reilly calling him a killer. Russia has asked for an unreserved apology from Fox news. Bill O'Reilly has not said anything close to sorry yet. With Putin's form, who knows what he is going to do next. May be Fox News will be hacked next and will be made to suffer huge financial loss to pay for their sins against Putin.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for leaving comments. You are making this discussion richer and more beneficial to everyone. Do not hold back.

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy