Skip to main content

America Will Start Leaving Afghanistan in June 2011 – Implications of Initial Surge & Eventual Withdrawal On Pakistan?

By Sikander Hayat



Finally President Obama has given the clearest signal yet that United States of America is losing its appetite for an unending conflict in Afghanistan. Obama has given a timeline for the withdrawal of the US forces from Afghanistan and for that withdrawal to happen, he has increased the number of troops in Afghanistan by another 30,000 to finish the job. This is a kind of final push by the American president who is worried by the state of economy at home and who knows that if economy is not fixed by the time next presidential elections are around in 2012, he will have no chance of getting elected again.

For that reason he wants to avoid a prolonged war and the best way to achieve the goal of a relatively short war is to put extra troops in the areas where Taliban are at their strongest. These are mostly southern & eastern provinces which include Helmand, Kandhar, Wardak, Paktia, Paktika, Farah etc. Fighting will be the fiercest in these areas, because Taliban had the chance to consolidate their gains in the last many years when America was busy in Iraq and it will be a bloody year for both sides if US really wants to take control of these areas.

Another priority will be to hunt down key figures of al-Qaida so that victory can be declared as soon as people like Osama and Aiman Al Zawahiri are dead. In my view that will be the best decision as it will concentrate US efforts on the real reason they came to Afghanistan and stop itself from being bogged down in another Vietnam like quagmire.

Hopefully yesterday’s speech by Obama will concentrate efforts in Afghanistan as well as currently this war is being run in a very day to day fashion and needs to rekindle its real focus in the Afghan theatre. Implications for Pakistan are very real and contain both good and bad elements. If America leaves with a strong Afghan army in place which can control the borders than it’s a good development and will stop the war in the tribal areas of Pakistan as well. If on the other hand America leaves without this arrangement then there will be chaos on both sides of the AfPak border.
In that case to stabilize tribal areas inside Pakistan, Pakistan will have to support some players in Afghanistan ( it may not be Taliban this time )and have no doubt about it that there cannot be a government in Afghanistan without the support of Pakistani Pakhtuns. So Obama administration will do well to take this basic fact into consideration while putting a government structure in Afghanistan and before leaving Afghanistan.

Comments

  1. Mr Sikander Your analysis of the situation is incomplete. Implication on Pakistan of this strategy will be much deep. It will bring the Taliban to Baluchistan, forcing the Pakistan to fight America's battle and that also on its own soil. Fighting in south-west has further complications as there is on-going separatist insurgency. You have talked only of implication when America will leave, what about these long 18 month? During these 18 month, I suppose, Pakistan has to pay high price. Regards.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for leaving comments. You are making this discussion richer and more beneficial to everyone. Do not hold back.

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy