Skip to main content

Behind Closed Doors - By Todd S. Purdum

You hear a lot about openness and transparency—and the disinfecting power of sunlight—as keys to effective government. But let’s summon at least two cheers for the occasional usefulness of the backroom deal.

United States Politics

The most encouraging news in Washington in ages was the word that Barack Obama and John Boehner were talking—by themselves, and to each other—about how to avoid the series of automatic tax increases and spending cuts that could send the country over the so-called fiscal cliff. Boehner went to see the president at the White House last Sunday for their first solo meeting since the November election.
It’s about time.
Because it’s a truth universally understood—if not universally acknowledged—in the capital these days that absolutely nothing important gets done in public. If, as Emerson said, “a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds,” transparency has become the mortal enemy of legislative achievement. The fetishistic, post-Watergate notion that the public’s business must always be done in public has produced a lot of fine-sounding preachments (from Obama, among others) but also a lot of governmental paralysis.
One of the cardinal mistakes of Obama’s first months in office was ceding too much control to House Democrats.
Watch just five minutes of Steven Spielberg’s gripping new Lincoln, and you’ll get a vivid sense of just how much can and should be done in the shadows—and at no real cost to a virtuous result. The 1964 Civil Rights Act was hammered out in private talks over plenty of bourbon between the Senate Republican leader, Everett Dirksen, and Democratic Justice Department aides; it had to be, because the Democratic chairman of the Judiciary Committee was one of the law’s chief opponents. In 1990, congressional negotiators and aides to the first President George Bush began the process of hammering out a budget deal in marathon closed-door sessions at Andrews Air Force Base. The deal helped spark an economic recovery (albeit not in time to save Bush from defeat at the hands of Bill Clinton).
Obama’s and Boehner’s House Republicans are still miles apart on how to reach a deal, and both sides continue to strike intransigent public postures that only make compromise harder. All the more reason why the two key players should keep talking as often and as quietly as possible. Boehner, who’ll have a hard job selling anything that smacks of reasonableness to the hot-headed Tea Party freshmen in his Republican caucus, needs all the running room he can get. He feels he’s been burned by leaks from past talks when too many people were in the room (but probably just as often by his own antsy lieutenants like Eric Cantor).
For the president’s part, he has no business getting the House Democratic leader, Nancy Pelosi, or the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, involved in the talks one minute before he has to. One of the cardinal mistakes of Obama’s first months in office was ceding too much control over the composition of his fiscal stimulus package to House Democrats, who larded it with pent-up partisan paybacks that made it ripe for Republican criticism and public opposition. Even an unshakable, ironclad agreement between Obama and Boehner might not guarantee a deal, but such an agreement must be the first step. There’s simply no alternative.
The outlines of a potential deal are clear to anyone conversant in elementary-school math. The president wants $1.6 trillion in new taxes over the next decade; Boehner and the Republicans have offered to raise $800 billion in new revenues (though they remain resistant to Obama’s insistence that the highest marginal tax rates for the wealthy go up). Doesn’t a tax/revenue increase of $1.2 trillion sound about right?
Republicans are demanding $600 billion in savings from federal health programs, and another $600 billion in other spending cuts. The White House’s opening offer was about $600 billion worth of cuts in all. Wouldn’t reductions of about $900 billion seem reasonable?
O.K., so my suggestion is crude and simplistic, but once upon a time—and not so long ago—splitting the difference was the American way. The voters themselves effectively did as much last month, returning both Obama and the Republican Congressional majority to power. As John F. Kennedy once sagely noted in another context, “There’s always some poor son of a bitch who didn’t get the word,” but must the folks in Washington always be the last to get with the program?
The prospect of a deal by year’s end seems dimmer and dimmer. But there are still hopeful signs. The second best bit of recent good news in Washington was that Boehner’s leadership group deprived four obstreperous House members—who had taxed his stewardship, griped in public, and generally caused him needless heartburn—of their plum committee assignments. The Washington Post reports that even the most hard-core members are giving Boehner new room to maneuver. So it’s no accident—and it might just be a boon—that the cigarette-loving Boehner’s office remains about the only room in the Capitol that is still actually smoke-filled. Obama has (we’re told) finally given up his own nicotine habit. If they can’t both keep on puffing, they can at least keep on talking.

Read the full story here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...

Mir Chakar Khan Rind - A Warrior Hero Of Baluchistan & Punjab Provinces of Pakistan

By Sikander Hayat The areas comprising the state of Pakistan have a rich history and are steeped in the traditions of martial kind. Tribes which are the foundation stone of Pakistan come from all ethnic groups of Pakistan either they be Sindhi, Balochi, Pathan or Punjabi. One of these men of war & honour were Mir Chakar Khan Rind. He is probably the most famous leader coming out of Baloch ethnic group of Pakistan. Mir Chakar Khan Rind or Chakar-i-Azam (1468 – 1565 ) was a Baloch king and ruler of Satghara in (Southern Pakistani Punjab) in the 15th century. He is considered a folk hero of the Baloch people and an important figure in the Baloch epic Hani and Sheh Mureed. Mir Chakar lived in Sibi in the hills of Balochistan and became the head of Rind tribe at the age of 18 after the death of his father Mir Shahak Khan. Mir Chakar's kingdom was short lived because of a civil war between the Lashari and Rind tribes of Balochistan. Mir Chakar and Mir Gwaharam Khan Lashari, hea...

Azad Kashmir - Is China Taking Extra Interest In Kashmir?

By Sikander Hayat All the pictures are from Azad Kashmir First let’s talk about the geography & political structure of Azad Kashmir. The Azad State of Jammu and Kashmir, usually shortened to Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) or, simply, Azad Kashmir, is the southernmost political entity of Pakistan. It covers an area of 13,297 km² (5,134 mi²), with its capital at Muzaffarabad , and has an estimated population of about four million. The state's financial matters, i.e., budget and tax affairs, are dealt with by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council, instead of by Pakistan's Central Board of Revenue. The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council is a supreme body consisting of 11 members, six from the government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and five from the government of Pakistan. Its chairman/chief executive is the president of Pakistan. Other members of the council are Azad Kashmir's own president and prime minister and a few other AJK ministers. Azad Jammu and Kashmir has its ...