Skip to main content

Free Speech In Pakistan

By Sikander Hayat

Finally, after so many days of pain, I have today heard what I should have heard a long time ago. Elections have been announced and not too late either. People of Pakistan will be given a chance to elect their representatives and if the elections are fair then the result would be a happy and prosperous Pakistan.
President Musharaf has made the right decision in removing the judges who were violating the limits of judiciary and instead of interpreting law and leaving law making to Parliament; they were trying to do all three roles.
Now the main thing to see is how parliament or new judiciary can help in rolling back the emergency while keeping the good aspects (removal of judges) intact.

American Media The first way is that parliament reconvenes and enshrines the PCO in law by two third majority; this can only happen if PPPP and PML (Q) can join forces. Second way is that Supreme Court of Pakistan rules in favour of President so that he can keep the uniform and 58 (2B), which gives him the power to dissolve assemblies in case country falls into trouble again, letting him organise the elections in the presence of international observers and let it be.
If everything goes according to the plan, which in Pakistan seldom happens, new Parliament can be sworn in by the end of February 2008 and that will be that.
Media must be allowed to come back on air after the elections because during the elections they will create more trouble than they are worth. Free speech is good but propaganda is as bad as praising of government by state media just for being government. Media has criticised and criticised for reasons only known to them. I believe media is ideologically driven in order to roll back the present order in Pakistan for something that even they do not know about.
This perhaps is the time to have a national debate about
American Media what we want to be as a nation. A nation which wants to be a secular multicultural federation or a fundamentalist state like Saudi or Afghanistan because if we don’t talk about it now then another sixty years will pass fighting over the ideological base of the country. Pakistan should be a secular country like Turkey where when given the choice, people have voted for Islam and not forced towards Islam. A true Muslim is that who belive in God without any fear, who goes to a mosque not to be praised by
American Media other people but because he wants to worship the almighty. .
Every man, women & child should have the fundamental right of free speech as long as it is not violating the rights of fellow Pakistanis. Some critics argue that people should be able to say anything they want and do anything they want to do but then every society has certain laws. For example if you got a vehicle which gives out a lot of smoke it wont be allowed on the road because it infringes on the right of other people to
American Media breath clean air. Now in this case the offence is not directed at any individual but it is still an offence. Similarly in countries like France denial of genocide of Armenians by the Turks is a crime, why? Throughout mainland Western Europe, Holocaust denial is a crime. Why? Aren’t these examples of breach of a right to free speech but certainly having these rules has a logic behind it. Allowing people to question the Holocaust will sow the seeds of doubt in new generations and eventually the air will be so muddled that a proportion of population will believe that itAmerican Media never happened. We all know that if we forget history, we are condemned to repeat it and that is what will happen. That is the reason that I say to western people, do not have a knee jerk reaction to anything coming out of the East, think about it. The laws which you think to be draconian may be the only hurdle between innocent people and their would-be killers.

Comments

  1. Geo TV & ARY Digital have been banned by the Zardari government. Pakistan's so called democrats are worse than the dictators. Zaradri & Pakistan Peoples Party must be ashamed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for leaving comments. You are making this discussion richer and more beneficial to everyone. Do not hold back.

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...