Skip to main content

US stocks recover despite criticism of Fed

 with thanks to FT.com

By Chris Giles in Davos, Ralph Atkins in Frankfurt and Paul J Davies in London

Published: January 23 2008 19:39 | Last updated: January 23 2008 20:40

European financial markets, business leaders and economists on Wednesday took a pessimistic view of the likely effect of the dramatic US interest rate cut.

There was also a growing sense of a split between the continent’s central banks and the US Federal Reserve as Jean-Claude Trichet, president of the European Central Bank, made clear to the European Parliament in Brussels that it would not bow easily to pressure for eurozone interest rate cuts. On Tuesday night Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England, had talked down expectations of substantial rate cuts in the UK.

EDITOR’S CHOICE
Overview: Fed’s cut fails to reassure nervous investors - Jan-23Short View: Bear market? - Jan-23Lex: Global interest rates - Jan-23Video interview: JPMorgan’s Jing Ulrich on the Fed rate cut’s effect on China - Jan-23Wall Street tumbles on bear market fears - Jan-23Buyers venture back into Asian stocks - Jan-23Although Asian markets, which had closed before the 75 basis points cut, reacted positively, in Europe and initially in the US the outlook was bleak.

In London the FTSE 100 lost most of what it had recovered the previous day immediately after the Fed’s move. The index closed down 130.8 points, or 2.3 per cent, at 5609.3. The FTSE Eurofirst 300 closed down 41.97 or 3.2 per cent, at 1262.40. Germany’s Xetra Dax index lost 4.88 per cent .

In midday trading, the S&P 500 was heading for its sixth straight day of losses at midday in New York after falling 25.62, or almost 2 per cent, to 1,284.88. But it recovered in late trading, moving up by 0.5 per cent, or 10 points, on the day in the hour ahead of the close, driven by a rally in financial stocks.

In the US Treasury market, bond prices fell as equities recovered, curbing an earlier move by investors towards safe havens. Before the turnround, the 30-year Treasury yield hit 4.101 per cent, its lowest ever level. In spite of Mr Trichet’s hawkish tone, markets are still pricing in ECB rate cuts this year.

The earlier sell-off mainly reflected worries over the prospects of the US slipping into a recession, but there are also concerns that central banks will not have the ability to support their economies whatever they do.

Professor Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University, said economic forces meant the cut would be as effective as “pushing on a piece of string”.

The Fed’s gambit also drew criticism. Stephen Roach of Morgan Stanley said in his FT.com blog from the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos that the Fed’s policy was “a dangerous and reckless and irresponsible way to run the world economy”.

Others felt the action was too little and too late. George Soros, the hedge fund manager, said at the World Economic Forum in Davos that the Fed was “well behind the curve” and he believed it would be hard for the US and UK to avoid recession.

John Studzinski, head of US private equity firm Blackstone’s advisory business, also in Davos, said: “Until the markets see a lot more leadership on a proactive basis rather than a reactive basis, you are going to continue to see this great anxiety.”

The reactions were not entirely negative. Larry Fink, chief executive of BlackRock, the US’s largest publicly traded fund management group, told the FT the markets were “neurotic” and added: “The Fed’s move was appropriate – it wasn’t a statement of panic. The Fed cuts will do the job but it will take time.”
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...