Skip to main content

Afghan leader assails U.S. and Britain over war

By Carlotta Gall

Saturday, April 26, 2008
KABUL: President Hamid Karzai strongly criticized the British and U.S. conduct of the war in Afghanistan on Friday, saying in an interview that his government should be given the lead in policy decisions.

Karzai said that he wanted U.S. forces to stop arresting suspected Taliban and their sympathizers, and that the continued threat of arrest and past mistreatment were discouraging Taliban from coming forward to lay down their arms.

He criticized the U.S.-led coalition as prosecuting the war on terrorism in Afghan villages, saying the real terrorist threat lay in sanctuaries of the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Pakistan.

The president said that civilian casualties, which have dropped substantially since last year, needed to cease completely. For nearly two years, the U.S.-led coalition has refused to recognize the need to create a trained police force, he said, leading to a critical lack of law and order.

The comments came as Karzai is starting to point toward re-election next year, after six years in office, and may be part of a political calculus to appear more assertive in his dealings with foreign powers as opponents line up to challenge him.

But they also follow a serious dip in his relations with some of the countries contributing to the NATO-led security force and the reconstruction of Afghanistan, and indicate that as the insurgency has escalated, so, too, has the chafing among allies.

Complaints have been rising for months among diplomats and visiting foreign officials about what is seen as Karzai's weak leadership, in particular his inability to curb narcotics trafficking and to remove inefficient or corrupt officials. Some diplomats have even expressed dismay that, for lack of an alternative, the country and its donors may face another five years of poor management by Karzai.

He was quick to reject such criticism, pointing out the "immense difficulties" that he and his government have faced - "What is it we have not gone through?" - while trying to rebuild a state that was utterly destroyed.

He called instead for greater respect of Afghanistan's fierce independence, and for more attention to be paid to building up the country, than doing things for it.

"For the success of the world in Afghanistan, it would be better to recognize this inherent character in Afghanistan and work with it and support it," he said, speaking at his presidential office. "Eventually, if the world is to succeed in Afghanistan, it will be by building the Afghan state, not by keeping it weak."

Karzai said he was fighting corruption, a problem that is among the chief complaints heard frequently by diplomats and Afghans alike. Karzai said he had just fired an official the previous day and would be firing more soon.

Yet he explained that Afghanistan had never had so much money and resources pouring in, or seen such disparities in salaries, and was simply not capable yet of preventing the corruption.

He admitted that "lots of things" in the past six years could have been handled better and singled out policies led by the United States, namely tackling terrorism and handling the Taliban, both as prisoners and on the battlefield.

On terrorism, he repeated a call he has made for several years, that sanctuaries across the border in Pakistan be closed off.

"There is no way but to close the sanctuaries," he said. "Pakistan will have no peace, Pakistan's progress will suffer, so will Afghanistan's peace and progress, so will the world's. If you want to live, and live in peace, and work for prosperity, that has to happen. The sanctuaries must go, period."

The deaths of civilians in the fighting has also been a big problem, he said. "It seriously undermines our efforts to have an effective campaign against terrorism," he said. While NATO says civilian casualties have declined in the last six months, Karzai said that was not good enough.

"I am not happy with civilian casualties coming down; I want an end to civilian casualties," he said. "As much as one may argue it's difficult, I don't accept that argument."

He added, "Because the war against terrorism is not in Afghan villages, the war against terrorism is elsewhere, and that's where the war should go," referring to the sanctuaries in Pakistan.

He said the issue had caused tension between him and U.S. officials. "While those moments were very, very difficult I must also be fair to say that our partners in America have recognized my concerns and have acted on them in good faith."

One of the biggest mistakes of the last six years has been the handling of the Taliban, he said, and the failure of his government to guarantee former members the amnesty that Karzai promised when the movement was toppled in December 2001.

He blamed mistreatment by some warlords and U.S. forces for driving the Taliban out of the country, to Pakistan, where they regrouped and took up weapons again.

"Some of the warlords, and the coalition forces at times, in certain areas of the country, behaved in a manner that frightened the Taliban to move away from Afghanistan," he said. "That should not have happened."

The weakness of his own government meant that he learned only much later of some of the things that were occurring, he said.

He gave an example of a former member of the Taliban who has been quietly running a paint shop in Kabul and has been arrested three times by U.S. and Afghan security services.

"We have to make sure that when a Talib comes to Afghanistan, that he is safe from arrest by the coalition," he said. "And we don't come to know when the coalition arrests them; it is a major problem for us, a problem that we have spoken about repeatedly without solution."

Asked if he could stop U.S. forces from arresting suspected Taliban or their sympathizers in Afghanistan, he said: "We are working hard on it, very hard on it."

The president added, "It has to happen."

He said he had not complained to the Americans about their treatment of people in their custody, despite long detentions, because he did not have details of specific cases.

Despite the many problems, Karzai expressed optimism over Afghanistan's path, and said that the change of government in Pakistan could bring progress against terrorism. "We began on a very good note," he said of relations with the new government, led by the party of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, who was assassinated in December.

"I am fairly confident of their good intentions," he said. "If the current government has the full backing of the military and intelligence circles in Pakistan and with the good intentions that they have, things will improve."

The president said he supported the Pakistani government's efforts to make peace with Taliban there who were not a threat to the rest of the world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...