Skip to main content

Revival of Khalistan demand in N America

In yet another indication that there are serious efforts to revive Khalistan movement in North America, a group of disgruntled Sikhs held demonstrations in cities across the United States and Canada on the occasion of the 24th anniversary of Operation Blue Star.

Candle light vigils in Gurudwaras on Friday and a series of meetings in about a dozen cities have been planned during the next few days including one outside the Indian Consulate in Toronto.

These Sikhs recently have participated in various Baisakhi Day parades raising slogans of Khalistan, carrying its banners and delivering speeches on independence of Sikhs in Toronto, Vancouver, New York and San Francisco.

''We are for a peaceful solution to this problem through negotiation, through the will of the people,'' Dr Amarjit Singh, of the Washington-based Khalistan Affairs Centre, said. Singh lead a peaceful protest of about three-dozen Sikhs including a dozen women and a couple of children outside the UN headquarters in New York on Thursday.

While no memorandum was submitted by the organisers - Sikh Youths of America, the protestors were displaying anti-India placards and banners and distributing flyers to passersby. Organisers said that as many as ten different Sikh organisations supported their demonstration outside the UN.

''We are protesting outside the UN because 24 years after the incident there has been no independent public inquiry of attack on our sacred Sikh shrines. It is a symbolic protest. We would keep on coming here until we get justice,'' said Amarjit Singh, who in the recent past has emerged as a prominent Sikh separatist leader.

With his office at the prestigious National Press Building in Washington, Singh has been holding a series of meetings across the US and Canada trying to garner support to revive the separatists Sikh movement again.

''It has not died down. It is only a matter of time,'' he said when asked if he still had the same support base in the community as was the case in 1980s, when Sikhs in the US and Canada were the backbone of the separatist movement.

Sikhs in North America in general and leadership of almost all the Gurudwara in particular support demand of a separate homeland, he claimed. Comparing Punjab with Kosovo and East Timur - Singh demanded that a free plebiscite be held in Punjab to let people decide about their future.

Claiming that nothing has changed, Singh warned if wrongs are not rectified there is a basic reason for the people to keep repeating what they did in 1980s. In recent months, they have been publishing increasing number of advertisements in newspapers.

''Trade is a big aspect of it, I guess, especially for the western countries,'' he said. At the same time, he was hopeful these countries would once again support their cause based on human rights.

Comments

  1. that's great! may God bless them to be successful in their goal to achieve autonomy and survival in corrupt state of India.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Salim,
    Thanks for your comment and I hope that you do send your comments regularly.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for leaving comments. You are making this discussion richer and more beneficial to everyone. Do not hold back.

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...