Skip to main content

The Case For India To Quit Kashmir



By Sikander Hayat

Indian government has banned all Kashmir based TV channels from airing their programmes.

This step has been taken to stop them from airing the successful pro independence rallies and Indian Army’s atrocities on the general public.

A march towards Pakistan by 50000 Kashmiris to tell the world where there heart lies and then a congregation of 500000 in Eidgah, Srinagar has made the Indian government insane out of all proportions and no amount of protest by bodies like United Nation is going to stop them from doing what they do best which is killing and raping their way through to the hearts and minds of Kashmiri people.


After 62 years of calling Kashmir an integral part of India, Indian government has convinced itself and its people that Kashmir is Indian and nothing can happen to take it away from India. A lot of very intelligent people in India talk about death of secularism, snowball effect and if Kashmir given independence other states following suit theory but there are so many fundamental factors which make Kashmir not just another Indian state.

1. There is no other Indian state for which Indian government has promised a plebiscite.
2. There is no other Indian state where there is a United Nations observer mission for last 60 odd years ( still stationed in Srinagar)
3. There is no other Indian state where by Indian government’s own admission, 35000 people have died at the hands of Indian security forces ( although independent sources put the death toll at 70000 plus)
4. There is no other Indian state over which India & Pakistan have fought three wars
5. There is no other Indian state where article 360 of the Indian constitution applies
6. There is no other Indian state which does not allow other Indians to become its citizens ( No Indian national is deemed a national of Kashmir but Kashmiris can call themselves nationals of India)
7. There is no other Indian State where other Indian citizens cannot buy property
8. There is not other Indian state where participation in last many elections have been less than 20%





There are so many distinctions in additions to ones mentioned above that there is no point in detailing them all here. My point is this; Kashmir was never a part of India and it was a gross dishonesty on part of successive Indian governments to build the grand building of secularism on Kashmir’s shoulders. India is a great nation with multiple identities and trying to say that if Kashmir goes everything else will go as well is in itself a notion which demeans India.


It is high time that India thinks about the consequences of keeping Kashmir part of India with the help of occupation troops whose estimates range from 500000 to 800000 otherwise India might have to face what it is trying to evade namely the death of secularism, repeat of carnage of Muslims in Gujrat and Mumbai and other communal violence which might tear India apart.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo

Mir Chakar Khan Rind - A Warrior Hero Of Baluchistan & Punjab Provinces of Pakistan

By Sikander Hayat The areas comprising the state of Pakistan have a rich history and are steeped in the traditions of martial kind. Tribes which are the foundation stone of Pakistan come from all ethnic groups of Pakistan either they be Sindhi, Balochi, Pathan or Punjabi. One of these men of war & honour were Mir Chakar Khan Rind. He is probably the most famous leader coming out of Baloch ethnic group of Pakistan. Mir Chakar Khan Rind or Chakar-i-Azam (1468 – 1565 ) was a Baloch king and ruler of Satghara in (Southern Pakistani Punjab) in the 15th century. He is considered a folk hero of the Baloch people and an important figure in the Baloch epic Hani and Sheh Mureed. Mir Chakar lived in Sibi in the hills of Balochistan and became the head of Rind tribe at the age of 18 after the death of his father Mir Shahak Khan. Mir Chakar's kingdom was short lived because of a civil war between the Lashari and Rind tribes of Balochistan. Mir Chakar and Mir Gwaharam Khan Lashari, hea