Skip to main content

Afghanistan, Pakistan to work on a joint strategy against terrorism; Karzai

NEW YORK, Sep 27 (APP): Afghan President Hamid Karzai Saturday said his country along with Pakistan will work on a joint strategy against terrorism and hoped that the US and other allies will step forward to make it a success. Karzai, whose country faces a growing Taliban insurgency due to lack of governance and nexus between drugs and terrorism, said the Pakistani President has the right inentions.

In an interview with Newsweek, President Karzai who has had two meetings with President Zardari this month said “we should all help President Zardari because he has the right intentions and the right policy for Pakistan and for the region.”

The meetings between the two leaders helped break the ice and defuse tensions that had risen over the past few months between Pakistan and Afghanistan and they reaffirmed their commitment to jointly fight terrorism and to bring peace to the region.

About his talks with President Zardari, the Afghan President said “we will work on a joint strategy against terrorism, and we hope that the United States and the rest of our allies will join us strongly in implementing that strategy to a successful completion.”

President Karzai said his government fully backed the government of President Zardari in his resolve to fight terrorism as it was a legitimate government and need to be backed.

“I have faith in Zardari, and I am sure he will deliver. I am hearing good things about Gen. Kiyani as well. Afghanistan will do everything to give them a sense of confidence,” Karzai added.

President Karzai also discussed the situation in Afghanistan and the challenges facing his country. He said the Taliban were not gaining strength, however called for right concentration of political and diplomatic measures to handle the extremists.

He did not agree that mere military means could be used to tackle the militants. “They should have used and kept open all options in order to bring security to Afghanistan and a successful conclusion to the war against terrorism,” Karzai said.

In an apparent reference to the recent killing of around 90 civilians by US troops, Karzai said it was a very serious issue in Afghanistan.

He described the United States as a friend of Afghanistan, but stressed that there have to be changes in the way they operate.

He said the victory lies in training the Afghan police besides a meaningful input of economic assistance to Afghanistan through Afghan institutions.

President Karzai said the Taliban were not being fueled by heroin money and have other sources of income.

“We have been able to bring a decline in poppy production in Afghanistan and reduced poppy production by 19 percent this year.”

Karzai advocated for more US troops in the country. He said “from the very beginning, the Afghan people have been asking for more forces.”

He said the international community has about 60,000 troops in Afghanistan. “What we would ask is that these forces be deployed at the right place, where there is a threat coming to Afghanistan, and that alongside these forces, there must be a lot of concentration on training the Afghan army and the police.”

Karzai replied in affirmative when asked whether he wished to run again for President.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...