Skip to main content

David Cameron stalls over Europe as split emerges with Boris Johnson


David Cameron today dug in over Europe and set himself at odds with Boris Johnson by refusing to say whether the Conservative Party would hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty if it comes into force before the general election.

The Tory leader will try to face down his party this week in Manchester by claiming that the Conservatives should have “one policy at a time”: to promise to hold a referendum while the treaty is still being debated elsewhere in Europe.

At the same time he will move to reassure the Eurosceptic wing of the party by promising to take back control from Brussels powers over social and employment legislation, which is likely to cause a huge row with other European leaders.

But Mr Cameron suffered an immediate setback after Mr Johnson, the Mayor of London, suggested that voters “deserve a say” on the Lisbon document, even if it has been ratified and “particularly if the upshot of the Lisbon Treaty is going to produce President Blair”.

Mr Cameron has come under pressure after the Irish voted by a margin of 2 to 1 on Friday to back the Lisbon Treaty. Although the Poles and Czechs have yet to ratify the legislation, European diplomats and foreign policy experts expect this to be complete by Christmas.

The Tories have long promised to hold a referendum if the Treaty has not been brought into force. However, if it is in place they have declined to go further, simply saying that they will “not let the matter rest there”.

This morning Mr Cameron suggested that, despite the Irish vote, nothing had changed. He said: “There were three countries [outstanding] and now there are two.”

He said that he still believed there was a good chance of the Treaty being discussed. “The Czech Prime Minister has talked about three to six months [to get the case through the constitutional court] and if it’s six that takes us over a general election.”

Privately, aides to Mr Cameron admit that they have little firm evidence to go on beyond a “hope” that it won’t be in place.

On Saturday the Tory leader sent an e-mail to all activists and MPs making it clear that he did not intend to say anything else this week on the issue.

However, Mr Johnson suggested that he wants Mr Cameron to go further. In an interview with The Sunday Times he said: “If we are faced with the prospect of Tony Blair suddenly emerging, suddenly pupating into an intergalactic spokesman for Europe, then I think the British people deserve a say on it.

“I do think it would be right for such a debate to be held, particularly if the upshot of the Lisbon treaty is going to produce President Blair.”

One Eurosceptic MP told The Times that few of his colleagues were likely to make a fuss over the issue of Europe this week because they knew that it would be damaging to the party’s fortunes. The priority is that Mr Cameron continues to promise to take back powers from Brussels.

The Tory leader did so this morning, agreeing to renegotiate Europe’s role in employment and social legislation.

“We think the social and employment legislation ought to be determined nationally rather than at a European level. On home affairs and justice it isn’t right,” he said.

He denied that he wanted Britain to leave Europe, saying: “We should be members of the European Union, taking it in the right direction.”

However, he admitted that this would mean being “frank, honest and candid” with the leaders of France and Germany over where the Tories would disagree with them.

Read The Full Story Here.

Comments

  1. You're right, it's intolerable. This will push some people to declare UDI.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for leaving comments. You are making this discussion richer and more beneficial to everyone. Do not hold back.

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...