Skip to main content

Has India Already Lost Kashmir?

Comments

  1. We speak the same language, we eat the same food, we see the same films,. we share the same culture...but we have different religions.... Indians and Pakistanis are a part of each other as they were always.
    Indians and Pakistanis must forget the past and see into the future. So much victims for nothing. I am praying for the day that those two countries will become united again under a new federal state. Jai Hind India and Pakistan Zindabad but as friends or better like brothers
    Shukria!

    ReplyDelete
  2. George Moustakas,

    "I am praying for the day that those two countries will become united again under a new federal state."
    This is exactly what Pakistanis hate about Indian expansionism. Besides, India is having trouble in holding on to the only Muslim majority state it has, it will be impossible for it to gobble up Pakistan.

    ReplyDelete
  3. dear sikandar, how many muslims live in India and how many muslims live in Pakistan?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Samurai,

    Pakistan is 98% Muslim populated and India is 90% non Muslim!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kashmir is a very trivial issue for India. We in India only see what the government and the media portrays to us. The truth is, we do not know what the ground situation is!

    To your point Sikandar, that since Kashmir is the only muslim majority state in India, India is having trouble holding onto it could be unfounded. The reason I am saying is not because I am a proud Indian, but I know how bad the politics are here in India.

    I would say it is the lack of opportunities for Kashmiri youth which is driving them to do these things. It is a vicious circle of suspicion and hatred. Whenever as Kashmiri youth comes down to Delhi or other parts of the country there is always a negative hostility from the so called 'mainstream'. And I agree this is our fault!!

    But somewhere down the line this hostility has a deep rooted negative feeling, not about the Kashmiri youth, but Muslim community. The things that have happened in the past (the bombings, terror attacks) have made every other non-muslim wary of Muslims. On the counter-argument the Gujrat Riots 2002 made us hate the Goverment of Gujrat and its chief minister Modi. Ditto for 1984 anti-sikh riots.

    So, the point now is you would have your arguments, which I can counter argue(and will be valid). And I will have my arguments which you would counter argue(and will be valid). So how do we move from here??

    The answer is fruitful talks and not just confidence building measures!! We at our end need to change our mindset towards Kashmiris and understand their problem rather then just brush them aside. And the Muslims needs to do something to change the image which has formed of it due to a handful of terrorists!

    Rohit
    New Delhi

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dear Rohit,

    Thanks for your comments. Your logic makes sense and it is good hear someone talk sanity. Meaningful talks are the only way forward. All sides must respect other side's views and find an amicable solution to Kashmir. But these talks must not be for the sake of talks but lead to some time bound conclusions.

    ReplyDelete
  7. dear, sikander in INDIA 27 crore muslim lives and in PAKISTAN it is about 25 crore. I wanna say that we just think about development of INDIA AND PAKISTAN not about who will get kashmir.

    ReplyDelete
  8. DEAR SIKANDER, I m proud to be an INDIAN and you proud to be aPAKISTANI. 27 CRORE muslim live in INDIA and about 25 crore muslim in PAKISTAN. PAKISTAN is totally a muslim country but INDIA is neither a hindu nor muslim nor other. INDIA is a mixture of diff. culters. I like my side u like ur. I just say that we just have to look toward both countrirs developement. It could not be possible without shaking. you should come to INDIA and i should visit PAKISTAN. This is the real solution. HITESH HARYANA

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Hitesh,

    Thanks for your comment on this blog. I agree with your sentiment in broader terms but there are issues of cultural affinity which we need to look at. Pakistanis look at Kashmir not only as a Muslim issue but more so in terms of a territory which was their's and was given by Hari Singh to India. Pakistan has never claimed any sovereignty on Hyderabad ( which decided to join Pakistan but was captured by India) because there is no geographical or cultural link between that state and Pakistan. Just being run by a Muslim Nizam and a large Muslim population does not qualify Hyderabad to be claimed by Pakistan. Most of India's Muslims have no cultural affinity with Pakistan. Kashmir is a totally different issue.
    But after saying that, I must also add here that if Kashmiris want to stay with India than that is their right. Pakistan cannot change the will of Kashmiris but for that India will have to ask the Kashmiris themselves.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for leaving comments. You are making this discussion richer and more beneficial to everyone. Do not hold back.

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...