Skip to main content

US Immigration policy - Romney opens door on immigration

HEMPSTEAD, N.Y. — Amid the attacks and countercharges in Tuesday’s debate, Mitt Romney appeared to make some news in saying he will seek to create ways to grant a path to citizenship to younger illegal immigrants brought here as children.
“The kids of those that came here illegally, those kids I think should have a pathway to become a permanent resident of the United States,” he said. “And military service, for instance, is one way they would have that kind of pathway to become a permanent resident.”
The Republican presidential nominee had previously listed the military service option, but had said that was the only exception he was willing to carve out. His comments in the debate, though, suggested a much broader policy that could apply to all illegal immigrant youths, known as Dreamers because they would have qualified for stalled legislation known as the Dream Act.
Immigration has been a thorny issue for both candidates, particularly since Hispanic voters, who are a fast-growing voter demographic, view the issue as important.
In 2008, then-candidate Barack Obama had promised to work on an immigration bill in his first year in the White House, but instead turned his attention to health care and the stimulus.
“He had a Democrat House and Democrat Senate, supermajority in both houses. Why did he fail to even promote legislation that would have provided an answer for those that want to come here legally and for those that are here illegally today?” Mr. Romney said at the debate.
For his part, Mr. Obama said he was having trouble convincing Republicans to join his effort.
He also said Mr. Romney called Arizona’s tough new law giving police the powers to check immigration status of those they suspect of being in the country illegally a “model” for other states. Those checks were upheld by the Supreme Court, though much of the rest of the law was struck down.
Mr. Romney had, in fact, said a different Arizona law was a model. That one requires employers to use an electronic federal system, E-Verify, to verify their workers. That law was upheld by the Supreme Court.
The president said Mr. Romney still can’t be trusted on the issue, saying he’d vowed to veto the Dream Act — a promise the Republican made during the primaries — and said Mr. Romney called for illegal immigrants to “self-deport.”
Mr. Obama also said Mr. Romney’s “top adviser on immigration” wrote both Arizona laws, so the Republican candidate is tied to them.
That adviser, Kris Kobach, told The Washington Times Tuesday night that Mr. Romney correctly explained self-deportation.
“He said that we should make it hard for illegal aliens to obtain jobs and taxpayer-subsidized benefits. If we do so, illegal aliens will leave of their own accord.
Evidently President Obama thinks that’s a bad idea. Obama is completely out of step with the American public on the immigration issue,” said Mr. Kobach, who is Kansas’ secretary of state.
“I predict that his statements in the debate will further alienate independent voters who are concerned about the millions of Americans who have lost jobs to illegal aliens.”


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...