Skip to main content

The American Revolution 1778-1783

1778
On February 6, 1778, France and America concluded an alliance by signing two treaties, a treaty of amity and commerce and a military alliance.  The nations exchanged ambassadors, and France and England were soon at war.  Parliament soon passed bills calling for reconciliation with America and sent a peace commission to Philadelphia to try to achieve a settlement.  The Americans, however, refused to accept the commission and declared that any person who met with the commission would be branded an enemy of the United States.  Congress responded that the only basis for reconciliation would be a full withdrawal of all British troops from American soil and recognition of American independence.  The war would continue.
The Battle of Monmouth
In May Sir Henry Clinton replaced General Howe and, hearing that a French fleet was en route to America, decided to move his army back to New York.  The Americans reoccupied Philadelphia on June 18, and Washington decided to pursue the retreating British across New Jersey.  On June 28 Washington caught up with the British at Monmouth Courthouse, New Jersey.  General Charles Lee was in command of an advance unit with orders to attack at the first opportunity.  Orders to Generals Lafayette and Anthony Wayne became confused, and Lee precipitously ordered a retreat, which brought on a counterattack by Clinton. Washington soon arrived on the scene and, furious at Lee’s order for retreat, is said to have sworn so forcefully that the leaves shook on the trees.  Washington rallied his men, and with the discipline instilled by the training of Baron von Steuben, the Americans met the British squarely.  Although the outcome was indecisive, it was clear that the Americans had fought the British to a standstill.  Clinton withdrew and took his army back into New York, and Washington moved north of the city and settled into camp near White Plains, about twenty miles north of Manhattan. The war in the North thus remained a stalemate—with Clinton boxed in in New York, and  Washington holding the Hudson River line.
THE WAR IN THE WEST
The majority of American Indians seem to have judged—correctly as it turned out—that an American victory in the Revolutionary War would probably lead to further trouble in the form of new encroachments on their lands.  A British victory would therefore be in their best interests—it was the British, after all, who had tried to confine the colonists to the territory east of the Appalachians.  The British, on their part, welcomed Indian allies in the West, but the outcome of the war and that alliance later hurt both the British and the Indians in their further struggles with the Americans.  The pro-British Iroquois under Joseph Brant did considerable damage to the Americans, but overall the Indian involvement in the war did the Native Americans more harm than good.
In 1778 the Wyoming Valley and Cherry Valley Massacres in Pennsylvania led by Loyalist Sir John Butler provoked a response from the Americans.  Indians swept through outlying settlements, terrorizing the people and killing forty survivors at Cherry Valley after they had surrendered.  Washington sent four thousand men under Generals Sullivan and Clinton to attack the Indians, and the American victories broke up the Six Nations.  In 1779 Colonel George Rogers Clarke’s expedition, commissioned by Virginia Governor Patrick Henry, against Colonel Henry Hamilton (the “hair buyer”) captured Kaskaskia, Cahokia, and Vincennes. Like much of the fighting on the frontier, the combat was especially bloody and brutal; Clarke’s victories secured American claims to western lands and ended British control in the Northwest. Worthy of note:  The Northwest territory (Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin) could otherwise have wound up as part of Canada.
THE WAR IN THE SOUTH
Considerable fighting occurred in the South early in the war, but it was mostly indecisive until 1778, while the focus was on the northern campaigns.  In 1779, with the results of fighting in the North failing to resolve the conflict, the British turned their attention to securing the South, where they felt strong loyalist support would aid them.  They took Savannah and later captured and burned Norfolk and Portsmouth.  (Norfolk was the most heavily damaged American city in the war.)  When the city of Charleston fell on May 12, 1780, a garrison of 5,400 Patriots surrendered, the worst defeat of the war for the Americans.
Meanwhile, on June 21, 1779, Spain declared war on Great Britain, though it refused to recognize American independence for fear of losing territory to the Americans.  (Spain’s fears were eventually played out after independence was secured.)  Although unsuccessful in gaining recognition from Spain, American Minister John Jay was able to borrow a small sum of money.  About the same time, Congress authorized John Adams to explore negotiations for a settlement of the war.  Aiding the American cause were the actions of naval hero John Paul Jones, who conducted raids along the coast of the British Isles and eventually defeated the HMS Serapis from his vessel, the Bonhomme Richard, named for Benjamin Franklin. Supported by the cavalry of Colonel Banastre Tarleton, a fierce and ruthless fighter, General Cornwallis routed an American army at Camden, South Carolina, on August 16, 1780.  Washington sent General Nathanael Greene to the South to replace General Gates, whose behavior on the battlefield at Camden had been grossly incompetent, as Cornwallis invaded North Carolina.  On October 7 a force of 1,100 loyalists were defeated at Kings Mountain by frontiersmen under Colonels Isaac Shelby and William Campbell.
1781:  The Final Showdown at Yorktown
With Greene now in command, the American forces, some elements commanded by Daniel Morgan, met and defeated Tarleton and Cornwallis at the Battle of Cowpens, where Greene used his militia to great advantage.  (A rough approximation of the Battle of Cowpens was depicted in the Mel Gibson film The Patriot.  The British colonel in the film was obviously based on Banastre Tarleton.) Following Cowpens, Cornwallis followed Daniel Morgan into North Carolina, and after Greene and Morgan combined forces they fought the British at Guilford Courthouse.  Although Cornwallis won the field, his losses weakened him and he had to retreat to Wilmington for reinforcements. Meanwhile, the United States Navy continued to give the British a bad time. 
During the course of the war American privateers, privately owned vessels commissioned by Congress to conduct raids on British shipping, captured six hundred British ships.  Although the navy was not able to take on the British fleet and large-scale battles, American sailors captured or destroyed 196 British vessels during the course of the war.  In 1781 French fleets were operating in the Caribbean and off the American coast, a development that eventually meant defeat for Cornwallis. In order to protect his forces in North Carolina, Cornwallis decided to invade Virginia.  Benedict Arnold, now a British brigadier general, conducted a raid on the capital and almost captured Governor Thomas Jefferson.  Generals Lafayette and von Steuben, however, their regiments reinforced, forced Cornwallis to retreat to Yorktown, Virginia, where he hoped to be reinforced by forces from New York under Henry Clinton.
North of New York City, Washington and Count Rochambeau, who had moved his army from Newport, were planning a joint attack on New York City, but Washington received a message via his ally that the French fleet under de Grasse was available for operations in the Chesapeake area.  British Admiral Graves attempted to drive the French away but was forced to withdraw back to New York, leaving Cornwallis isolated. Seizing the opportunity, Washington and Rochambeau marched rapidly to Yorktown (some units transported by the French fleet), making feints against New York to keep the British off guard.  Setting up a siege around Cornwallis’s position, Washington began hammering the British position with artillery.  Led by Colonel Alexander Hamilton, the Americans captured two redoubts along the British line, and when a counterattack failed, Cornwallis realized that his position was hopeless.  His attempted withdrawal across the York River was foiled by a storm, and the British fleet was unable to rescue him because of the French naval victories off the Virginia Capes.  Out of options, Cornwallis surrendered on October 19, 1781.  For all practical purposes, the American war for Independence was over.



The Paris Treaty of 1783 Ends the American Revolution
The British government now found the struggle too costly to continue and decided to settle for peace on American terms.  The American peace commission included Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, John Jay, and Henry Laurens.  Thomas Jefferson was also appointed but did not go to France. Although the American delegation had been directed by Congress to negotiate in coordination with the French, because of the complicated other issues involving Spain and other countries, the Americans settled with the British independently. French Minister Count Vergennes was not pleased, but recognized that the result was favorable to the Americans By playing France off against England, the Americans secured highly favorable terms:  American independence was recognized; all territory east of the Mississippi River between Canada and Florida was ceded to the United States; the Americans were granted joint navigation of the Mississippi River and the right to use fisheries off the Canadian coast; there was to be no lawful impediment to the collection of private debts on either side, and restitution was recommended for the loyalists; finally, the British were to withdraw from all outposts in the Northwest.  The Americans were successful for a variety of reasons, some purely fortuitous.  Some British, for example, were quite comfortable with American independence.  They also wanted good trade relations, they wanted to keep America outside the sphere of French influence, and they were still at war with much of Europe.
Other Issues of the American Revolution
Washington from time to time had great difficulty in keeping his troops from rebelling against the shoddy treatment the army was afforded because of inefficiencies in Congress.  On May 25, 1780, a near mutiny occurred in Washington’s headquarters over the issue of pay and general discontent.  In January 1781 an event known as the “mutiny of the Pennsylvania line” occurred and had to be put down forcefully. 
Washington's Newburgh Address
Following the war, with Washington’s army still encamped in Newburgh, a group of officers threatened to defy Congress if they did not receive promised pay and reimbursement for food and clothing.  Washington got wind of the movement and addressed the officers in person.  Having difficulty reading his prepared remarks, Washington fumbled for his spectacles and said, “Gentlemen, I beg your pardon, but I have grown not only gray but blind in the service of my country.”  Moved by the image of Washington’s personal sacrifices, the officers withdrew their protests when Washington promised quick redress for their grievances.  Shortly after, Congress granted the officers of the army a generous settlement.  Washington’s actions are seen as setting a historic precedent for civilian control of the military.
American Diplomacy during the Revolution
American diplomacy during the war was quite effective.  France and Spain still hated Great Britain after the Seven Years’ War, and American agents Silas Deane, Arthur Lee, and Benjamin Franklin used that fact  to advantage.  Franklin was most important—he was well known in Europe, an experienced diplomat, and an excellent propagandist.  Through Franklin’s efforts, France gave much to the American cause, but got little in return; having no particular friendship toward America, and certainly not interested in supporting policies that would threaten the French Crown, France acted in its own best interest, as nations generally do.  The Americans, of course, never said that George III did not have the right to rule; they merely said he did not have the right to rule them.
The Netherlands took advantage of the war to hijack British trade.  John Adams was sent as minister in 1780, where he secured formal recognition, concluded a treaty of amity and commerce, and was able to secure a substantial loan.
Government during the Revolutionary War
The Second Continental Congress was de facto the American government for most of the period of the American Revolution.  With no real executive and uncertain support from the thirteen states, the Congress operated with notorious inefficiency.  In its daily work the Congress functioned by committee (John Adams served on dozens), and it was hard to fix responsibility for any task anywhere.  Money was chronically short, and the states still thought of themselves as separate entities merely gathered for the conduct of the war.
Shortly before the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776, however, John Dickinson headed a committee that began drafting a plan for association that eventually became the Articles of Confederation.  The articles were presented in July of that year and were debated for more than a year.  Congress eventually approved the articles in October 1777, and the articles were submitted to the states for ratification.
Because unanimous consent of all states was required for ratification, and because the states—which were engaged in a war of rebellion against what they saw as a tyrannical authority—were reluctant to take any action threatening their sovereignty, the articles were not ratified until March 1781.
Despite its shortcomings, the Continental Congress achieved much. They declared independence, successfully conducted the war, sent ambassadors to foreign nations and gained the powerful support of France, oversaw the negotiation of an extremely favorable treaty, and for better or worse kept the Revolution alive through some very dark days. It was government by committee, not always a good thing, but under the circumstances it was probably better than having a strong leader who would inevitably have caused resentment.
Loyalists in the Revolution
Many Americans had remained loyal because they feared that independence would bring chaos, and that there was no guarantee that the government they were going to get would be any better—if indeed as good—as the one they were giving up.  (One famous Loyalist motto went, “I would rather have one tyrant 3000 miles away than 3000 tyrants one mile away.”) The loyalists thought that independence would threaten the liberties for which other Americans were fighting.  They were poorly treated on both sides. The English did not trust them, and the Americans confiscated their property and even imprisoned, punished, or executed them.  By the time the war was over, more than 100,000 loyalists had left the United States, many for Canada and some back to England, bitter at their treatment.  Most of them were never reimbursed for their losses despite agreements made in the Treaty, and most of them never returned.
Women and the Revolution
Beginning with the policy of nonimportation and the wearing of homespun clothing as a patriotic gesture, many American women had entered the political arena as contributors if not actual participants.  Women in the 18th century had no reason to expect that they might become more politically liberated, for with the exception of  monarchs such as Elizabeth the Great and Queen Anne, not to mention Catherine the Great of Russia, who reigned at that time, women had generally been excluded from European politics for centuries.  But American women, who were often fairly well read and literate, were conscious of ideas of republicanism and democracy and began to develop the hope that those enlightened ideas might alter their state.
Abigail Adams famously pleaded with her husband to “remember the ladies” as the men of the Second Continental Congress plotted their Revolution.  Although Adams, who loved and admired his wife as his most faithful counselor, treated her remarks lightly, he was probably sympathetic; but one revolution at a time was more than plenty to handle.
The Revolution did not directly address the issue of women’s rights in any way (nor did it take note of the institution of slavery beyond the fact that the British offered freedom to slaves who would fight against the Americans, a promise they kept).  The growth of republican ideas offered the possibility of substantial change once the American nation found its proper form of government.  We will discuss the idea of republican motherhood in the women’s rights movement in due course, but it should be noted that women did participate in significant ways during the war itself.
The famous “Molly Pitcher,” so called because of her carrying water for the soldiers, helped man the guns in time of need.  Women accompanying the army carried out various logistics functions, from assisting with preparation of food, to caring for clothing and uniforms, to tending to the wounded.  Following the war, Washington himself recognized the many contributions of women to the Patriot cause, symbolized to an extent by the presence of Martha Washington in the American camp during the difficult winter at Valley Forge.
It is also worth noting that the first full history of the American Revolution was written by a woman, Mercy Otis Warren, the sister of James Otis, who had protested the Writs of Assistance in 1761.  Mercy Warren was a good friend of Abigail Adams, and both women and many others were fully tuned to the political realities, not only of the Revolution but also of the challenges facing the nation once the war was over. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo

Mir Chakar Khan Rind - A Warrior Hero Of Baluchistan & Punjab Provinces of Pakistan

By Sikander Hayat The areas comprising the state of Pakistan have a rich history and are steeped in the traditions of martial kind. Tribes which are the foundation stone of Pakistan come from all ethnic groups of Pakistan either they be Sindhi, Balochi, Pathan or Punjabi. One of these men of war & honour were Mir Chakar Khan Rind. He is probably the most famous leader coming out of Baloch ethnic group of Pakistan. Mir Chakar Khan Rind or Chakar-i-Azam (1468 – 1565 ) was a Baloch king and ruler of Satghara in (Southern Pakistani Punjab) in the 15th century. He is considered a folk hero of the Baloch people and an important figure in the Baloch epic Hani and Sheh Mureed. Mir Chakar lived in Sibi in the hills of Balochistan and became the head of Rind tribe at the age of 18 after the death of his father Mir Shahak Khan. Mir Chakar's kingdom was short lived because of a civil war between the Lashari and Rind tribes of Balochistan. Mir Chakar and Mir Gwaharam Khan Lashari, hea