Skip to main content

Australia's stronger immigration - the other inflation dampener

Tucked away in Friday’s Reserve Bank statement on monetary policy is the assumption that Canberra is too afraid to make: Australia’s working age population will grow by 1.7 per cent over the next 2 years “in line with the recent pick-up in the rate of immigration”.
Ever since Kevin Rudd made the mistake of calling a population of 40-odd million “Big Australia”, politicians on both sides have run a mile from population growth figures. Government and opposition alike prefer to ignore population questions and, when cornered, tend to resort to various weasel words to give the impression that nothing much is happening and we should all just move along. It’s even Liberal Party policy to out-source migration levels to the Productivity Commission so that politicians won’t be held responsible.
But what both sides of politics know and quietly go along with is that 40 million is not actually a “Big Australia” – it’s simply what we have to have to handle the strain of Baby Boomers retiring from the workforce and becoming very expensive to keep in their old age. Without an on-going strong skilled migration program, Gen X and Y would have to pay vastly more tax to support Boomers for whom compulsory super came along too late. And even with migration growth, our demographics say the total tax take will still have to rise.
(At this stage, the anti-population growth mob generally jump up and down, shouting that we can’t just keep growing to support retirees, that it’s a giant population Ponzi scheme. But we don’t have to keep growing – once the Boomers eventually shuffle off, Gen X and Y should have enough superannuation to fund their own retirement.)
Part of the immediate impact of stronger working-age population growth is to dampen inflation. With the labour market already soft and employment growth low, adding more people to the mix – especially in areas of shortages – tends to keep wages growth subdued. The 1.7 per cent forecast of working age population is quite strong, particularly when employment growth itself is flat. Thus it’s not a surprise that the RBA forecasts wages index growth will slow a little to 3.5 per cent in 2013 and 2014.
That in turn is one of the reasons why I think the RBA isn’t quite as worried about the inflation rate increasing a little next year as most of the commentariat assumes. The central bankers also note that our productivity growth rate has picked up recently – another way of keeping inflation under control.
And really the neat thing about well-targeted immigration is that while it can dampen inflation, it can also lift economic growth. For example, it’s one of the factors that has the RBA and the Treasury believing the housing industry will pick up next year after being flat this year and going backwards in 2011.
Most discussion about managing the economy tends to concentrate on just monetary (interest rates) and fiscal (government spending) policy, ignoring the third arm of population policy. Fortunately, the RBA doesn’t.

Read the full story here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...