Tucked away in Friday’s Reserve Bank statement on monetary policy is
the assumption that Canberra is too afraid to make: Australia’s working
age population will grow by 1.7 per cent over the next 2 years “in line
with the recent pick-up in the rate of immigration”.
Ever since Kevin Rudd made the mistake of calling a population of 40-odd million “Big Australia”, politicians on both sides have run a mile from population growth figures. Government and opposition alike prefer to ignore population questions and, when cornered, tend to resort to various weasel words to give the impression that nothing much is happening and we should all just move along. It’s even Liberal Party policy to out-source migration levels to the Productivity Commission so that politicians won’t be held responsible.
Read the full story here.
Ever since Kevin Rudd made the mistake of calling a population of 40-odd million “Big Australia”, politicians on both sides have run a mile from population growth figures. Government and opposition alike prefer to ignore population questions and, when cornered, tend to resort to various weasel words to give the impression that nothing much is happening and we should all just move along. It’s even Liberal Party policy to out-source migration levels to the Productivity Commission so that politicians won’t be held responsible.
But
what both sides of politics know and quietly go along with is that 40
million is not actually a “Big Australia” – it’s simply what we have to
have to handle the strain of Baby Boomers retiring from the workforce
and becoming very expensive to keep in their old age. Without an
on-going strong skilled migration program, Gen X and Y would have to pay
vastly more tax to support Boomers for whom compulsory super came along
too late. And even with migration growth, our demographics say the
total tax take will still have to rise.
(At this
stage, the anti-population growth mob generally jump up and down,
shouting that we can’t just keep growing to support retirees, that it’s a
giant population Ponzi scheme. But we don’t have to keep growing – once
the Boomers eventually shuffle off, Gen X and Y should have enough
superannuation to fund their own retirement.)
Part
of the immediate impact of stronger working-age population growth is to
dampen inflation. With the labour market already soft and employment
growth low, adding more people to the mix – especially in areas of
shortages – tends to keep wages growth subdued. The 1.7 per cent
forecast of working age population is quite strong, particularly when
employment growth itself is flat. Thus it’s not a surprise that the RBA
forecasts wages index growth will slow a little to 3.5 per cent in 2013
and 2014.
That in turn is one of the reasons why I
think the RBA isn’t quite as worried about the inflation rate increasing
a little next year as most of the commentariat assumes. The central
bankers also note that our productivity growth rate has picked up
recently – another way of keeping inflation under control.
And
really the neat thing about well-targeted immigration is that while it
can dampen inflation, it can also lift economic growth. For example,
it’s one of the factors that has the RBA and the Treasury believing the
housing industry will pick up next year after being flat this year and
going backwards in 2011.
Most discussion about managing the economy
tends to concentrate on just monetary (interest rates) and fiscal
(government spending) policy, ignoring the third arm of population
policy. Fortunately, the RBA doesn’t.Read the full story here.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for leaving comments. You are making this discussion richer and more beneficial to everyone. Do not hold back.