Skip to main content

Britain will be expected to plan national defence with the rest of the European Union after David Cameron agreed to accelerate joint military operations

David Cameron signs up to more joint military operations with Europe

Under a deal reached in Brussels yesterday, leaders of all 27 EU countries promised to “strengthen” Europe’s ability to deploy troops “rapidly and effectively” in any future crisis.
They committed to “systematically considering cooperation” across Europe whenever EU member states begin drawing up their national defence plans.
Downing Street sources said the Prime Minister was “entirely happy” with the new arrangements. Britain already has a formal treaty with France for sharing defence capabilities, such aircraft carrier capacity.
Government sources said the new agreement would pave the way for Britain to extend this collaboration beyond France to other countries.
However, the Prime Minister immediately faced a backlash from his own Conservative MPs, who warned it was the first step to creating a European army.
The development comes as five countries - France, Germany, Spain, Italy and Poland – prepare to step up moves for a formal joint EU military command structure and an operational headquarters.
Some fear the new arrangement will provide a European rival to Nato.
Douglas Carswell, Conservative MP for Clacton, said: “This really shows that we can’t trust our negotiating team. You turn your back for two minutes and they go and sign up to something as daft as this.
“This might look like a good deal for those in Number 10 but outside Westminster it is anything but a good deal.
“If anyone seriously believes that it is in our national interest to hand over our defence to the people running the euro then we would need our heads examined.”
The British diplomats who are permanently based in Brussels are “beyond scrutiny so they end up negotiating their way into these ludicrous positions”, he said.
“In the 1970s, this country was run by those who believed in managing decline. To me, this is decline management. I thought to Conservative Party was supposed to try and stop this sort of thing.”
Tory MP Peter Bone said: “The Conservative Party position has always been that Nato is the bedrock of the defence of Europe.
“The idea of a European defence force is something that we’ve absolutely been against.
“The Prime Minister will have to come to the House of Commons on Monday and clarify the position. Even if this is only a first step it is worrying.
“We know how the European Union behaves. Slice by slice they will expand their influence and what begins as cooperation will end up as a Euro Army, which is something we have always been opposed to.
“The Prime Minister will have to answer that. If this is a shift in position it won’t be acceptable to the party or the country.”
Francois Hollande, the French President, said that France was a strong supporter of “defence Europe”.
“There is a willingness to strengthen defence capacity and to develop a European defence industry,” he said.
“We want to act in Europe. In order to be heard at the international level, defence resources are fundamental. So we agree to cooperate, we agree to hold joint missions.”

Read the full story here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...