Obama’s trump card on the debt limit
The good news is this can be done with an investment of a mere five minutes of your time. So here’s a plan.
To listen to the GOP, in other words, you’d think they support budgets that don’t add much to the debt at all. This is demonstrably, laughably, even shockingly false. But only a president can emblazon this fact on America’s consciousness and move it to the center of the conversation. Once you do, it will force Republicans to alter their calculations in the current showdown.
The way to do this is to propose (in a bipartisan spirit, if you’re feeling sly) that the debt limit be raised just by the amount it would take to accommodate the debt Republicans voted for in Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget last year — $6 trillion over the next decade.
This fabulous fact proves beyond question (Sen. Mitch McConnell’s griping to the contrary aside) that the debt-ceiling clash has nothing to do with shrinking the debt. Raising the ceiling is about acknowledging what both parties know — that under any fiscal scenario, we need a glide path back to balanced budgets after the outsized recession-induced deficits we’ve incurred.
I’ve ranted about this little publicized $6 trillion fact before, but I’m just a pundit. My obsessions spawn a few links and tweets. As president, however, if you make this point a staple of your public comments in the days ahead, it will dominate press coverage and put Republicans on the run.
How might you proceed?
● Let the TV cameras in briefly before you and House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) meet, and allow one question Jay Carney has planted on the debt ceiling. Then say: “My latest offer to John is that we raise the debt ceiling just by what it would take to accommodate the debt in the Ryan budget Republicans voted for last year. Most people don’t realize Republicans voted for $6 trillion in new debt over the next decade. I think honoring their vote on the debt is a fair way to resolve this — any other posture would mean they’re using the debt ceiling as a form of extortion. I won’t allow that, and I’m sure John would agree it would be destabilizing for world markets.”
Read the full story here.