Skip to main content

Right-to-work returns Michigan to the people - By Nolan Finley

Union chants echoed off the Capitol dome before the Republican-controlled state Legislature's courageous vote on the right-to-work bill: "Whose house?" "Our house!"
Not anymore. The Capitol now belongs to all the people of Michigan.
For 60 years or so, labor unions have dominated policymaking and politics in this state. Even as their membership dwindled to a sliver of the work force — 17 percent — their stifling influence over Lansing kept Michigan from adopting the common-sense reforms that would have made it more competitive for jobs and investment.
Competitiveness is what Gov. Rick Snyder is all about. His decision to lead the right-to-work push stemmed from his desire to give Michigan every advantage possible in competing with other states for economic development. It was not, as his critics charge, a capitulation to big money GOP interests or a hypocritical betrayal of his commitment to relentless positive action.
The only hypocrisy at work is labor's wailing that Snyder broke his pledge to avoid divisive issues.
For two years, Snyder has been trying to raise Michigan from the ruins of the union-backed Granholm administration. He's put in place policies to improve the state's attractiveness to job creators and made better use of precious taxpayer dollars. He's fought to keep the burden of today's spending from breaking the backs of future generations.
And the unions have fought him every inch of the way. They've sued him when he tried to save Detroit from fiscal oblivion. They sued him when he sought to bring public employee benefits in line with those of private-sector taxpayers. They hit him with a costly referendum to undo his agenda. They've instructed their Democratic puppets in the Legislature and on the Detroit City Council to oppose him on every significant measure he's offered.
Yet now they claim it's Snyder who is dividing Michigan. Labor and Democrats had a chance to work with the least partisan Michigan governor ever to fix the state, and instead they chose to fight. And they lost.
They lost in large part because they no longer have the hearts of Michigan's citizens. Those 83 percent who don't belong to unions, but have had to live under their political dictates, handed the union's power-grabbing Prop 2 a huge defeat in November, paving the way for right-to-work.
Michigan residents have watched for decades as union intransigence drove jobs from this state and kept new jobs out. They bear the unfairness of having to sacrifice public safety and other services to pay for absurd public employee pensions that they'll never enjoy themselves. They see through the hysterical, false claims that this bill will destroy unions and end collective bargaining and wonder why unions are so afraid of giving their members a choice.
And they don't buy that unions hold the key to the middle class.
In recent years, the labor movement has been a primary force in killing middle-class jobs. Yet we're supposed to maintain fealty to the movement because it supposedly created the middle class.
Well, a Republican president freed the slaves. But in the last election, 93 percent of African American voters cast their ballots for a Democrat.
Times change. Right-to-work will allow Michigan to change, too — into a state that works for all its citizens.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo

Mir Chakar Khan Rind - A Warrior Hero Of Baluchistan & Punjab Provinces of Pakistan

By Sikander Hayat The areas comprising the state of Pakistan have a rich history and are steeped in the traditions of martial kind. Tribes which are the foundation stone of Pakistan come from all ethnic groups of Pakistan either they be Sindhi, Balochi, Pathan or Punjabi. One of these men of war & honour were Mir Chakar Khan Rind. He is probably the most famous leader coming out of Baloch ethnic group of Pakistan. Mir Chakar Khan Rind or Chakar-i-Azam (1468 – 1565 ) was a Baloch king and ruler of Satghara in (Southern Pakistani Punjab) in the 15th century. He is considered a folk hero of the Baloch people and an important figure in the Baloch epic Hani and Sheh Mureed. Mir Chakar lived in Sibi in the hills of Balochistan and became the head of Rind tribe at the age of 18 after the death of his father Mir Shahak Khan. Mir Chakar's kingdom was short lived because of a civil war between the Lashari and Rind tribes of Balochistan. Mir Chakar and Mir Gwaharam Khan Lashari, hea