The gay marriage row is bringing the politics of division to a country more used to tolerance
George W Bush once declared that the problem with the French is that they have
no word for “entrepreneur”. This story (told by Baroness Williams, who says
she was told it by Tony Blair) was intended to ridicule the ex-president.
But his overall conceit is sound: a country and its culture can be defined
by its vocabulary, or lack of it. The Italians have no word for
“leadership”; the Germans have no word for “small talk”; and the Eskimos
have no word for “war”.
Some concepts are simply alien to some cultures, which is why the British have
no word for “Kulturkampf”. The practice of “culture wars” – dividing a
nation into warring tribes and then exploiting that division – has been
happily absent from our politics. Anyone visiting the United States during
election time will watch, amazed, the bitter arguments about abortion, gun
control or the teaching of evolution. The power of these debates is
astonishing: they can set neighbour against neighbour, while often bearing
only a tangential relationship to the issues actually resolved at election
time.
Returning home, a Brit can tune into the evening news and sigh with relief at
our less lively, but rather saner, public discussion. But the news, in
recent days, has started to sound a little more American. MPs have been
quoting the Bible in just the same way, and getting themselves just as wound
up. David Cameron’s plans for gay marriage, which were controversial enough
in the first place, have been made even more so by his decision to let such
unions take place in churches. After two years of trying to discuss this
rationally, tribal battle has now broken out. A group of liberal Tories
calling themselves the “Freedom to Marry” alliance are up against a group of
less organised, lesser known and less telegenic Conservatives who are
popping up on TV to denounce the Government. The ordinary viewer may
conclude that the Tory party is going through one of its periodic bouts of
madness.
I suspect that, by now, even Cameron is wondering if this has not all spun out
of control. It’s perfectly easy to see his original logic. As a matter of
principle, he believes in marriage and would like it to be accessible to
everyone. If the Unitarian Church and certain strands of Judaism want to
marry gay couples on their premises, then why should government stand in
their way? For the record, I quite agree. Religious freedom in Britain ought
to be universal, extended to the handful of churches or synagogues who want
same-sex marriage. To lift the ban ought to be a technical issue, an
amendment to the Civil Partnership Act 2004 requiring no fanfare.
But this time, there has been not just a fanfare, but the drumbeat of war.
Nick Clegg released the text of a speech in which he regretted the fact that
economic turmoil “gives the bigots a stick to beat us with, as they demand
we 'postpone’ the equalities agenda”. He later withdrew the b-word, but his
point was made: that Britain is now divided into two camps. You have the
Liberal Democrats, friends of equality. And on the other side, the “bigots”
– a group that presumably includes followers of every mainstream religion. A
former adviser to Clegg resurfaced to say that his boss ought to have stuck
to his word, because such people are indeed bigots.
Read the full story here.
Read the full story here.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for leaving comments. You are making this discussion richer and more beneficial to everyone. Do not hold back.