Skip to main content

The Schengen Treaty - Fundamental tenet of EU questioned

European Union Schengen treaty WASHINGTON – The Schengen Treaty, which is one of the basic tenets of the European Union and allows people to move freely among member countries, is increasingly being threatened as the economic situation throughout Europe becomes progressively serious, according to a report from Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.
What the treaty did was eliminate border controls among the E.U. members. It has become what has been described as one of the most visible symbols of that union. Nations throughout Central Europe to West European have done away with their internal border controls.
Twenty-six countries belong to the Schengen Treaty, which includes all of the E.U. countries except the United Kingdom and Ireland. Other non-E.U. countries which are signatories to the Schengen Treaty are Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.
For Europe, the Schengen Treaty has not only been a symbol of unity but also success of the E.U. – until now.
With the influx of people from non-E.U. countries, mainly refugees fleeing Greece and Italy as well as those escaping the civil war in Libya last year, there was created a heavy economic drain on the economies of the E.U. countries, especially those which themselves where experiencing hard times.
The latest economic downturn in Europe’s economic health underscored the additional problem when members created the E.U., they ceded sovereignty to supranational institutions, especially on the issue of economics.
This development prompted some members to consider giving the European Commission the power to decide when to allow a country to increase its border controls.
Last April, this consideration prompted France and Germany to complain to the president of the European Union – Denmark at the time. Denmark was one of those countries considering reimposing border controls after having done away with them many years ago.
The Schengen Treaty, however, does allow a country to reimpose border controls without E.U. authorization under extreme conditions and only for a short time.
Consideration of reimposing border controls, even for a short period, came amid the worst economic crisis Europe had experienced in decades.
Those countries considering such action wanted to do it to protect their own labor markets which were being flooded with workers either as a result of the influx of new refugees or high unemployment in other E.U. countries.
Those countries which were feeling the employment pinch as a result of Europe’s economic downturn were Spain, Ireland and Portugal. In addition, Greece had become the main avenue for illegal immigrants from the Balkans and Turkey, as was Italy due to the influx of refugees escaping the civil war in Libya.
Because these countries already had serious unemployment, their residents legally could go into the other E.U. countries looking for jobs, placing greater pressure on those other countries for limited available jobs.
Regional sources say that modification of the Schengen Treaty is only talk for now and that discussion on the issue is for domestic political consumption in countries experiencing continuing labor problems from the influx of illegal immigrants or the unemployed from other E.U., Schengen members.
However, this could change to possible action if Europe’s economic crisis deepens. Indeed, there is such a prospect, not only because of continuing economic difficulties Europe is experiencing but also from the effects of the United States going over its own “fiscal cliff” come the beginning of the new year.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...