Skip to main content

The Scottish Nationalist Party is offering us a one-way ticket to a deeply uncertain future

Is Scotland in Europe? The SNP doesn’t even know

Alex Salmond, Scotland’s First Minister, is flying by the seat of his pants. Hardly a week goes by without another embarrassing U-turn on his claims about what independence will mean for Scotland. The SNP has had 80 years to plan for this. Yet it is increasingly clear that they are woefully underprepared for the referendum to be held in less than two years’ time.
A diet of bluster is proving no substitute for the hard-headed argument needed to win over Scots’ hearts and minds. With each U-turn, Mr Salmond’s party creates a loss of confidence. No wonder the voices of dissent within its ranks are beginning to be heard. Whether it is on Scotland’s admission to the European Union, on what currency we would use, or the impact on energy supplies, the nationalists are all over the place.
You might have hoped that the SNP would have thought out a credible position on Scotland’s membership of the EU. After all, it’s central to our economic prospects. Scottish businesses need to know where we would stand if Scotland were to break from the rest of the United Kingdom. Until a few weeks ago the nationalists, ever anxious to reassure a doubting populace, claimed that Scotland would automatically be a member of the EU upon independence.
What’s more, they said there was a legal opinion to back that up. They have since had to admit that there was never a legal opinion. And, in a major blow, José Barroso, the President of the European Commission, has said that Scotland will have to reapply for membership. As a result, in their most spectacular climbdown to date, the SNP has admitted that there would indeed have to be a negotiation.
Nobody knows what form these discussions would take, or how long they would last. I know, from experience, that matters will be complicated, because many of the 27 member states have their own agendas, especially on separation: Spain springs to mind. But be in no doubt, negotiation means that the euro, border control, and our rebate will be on the table. Who can foresee what demands might be made? What we do know, however, is that new member states have until now been asked to sign up for the euro. We also know that the EU does not like the British rebate and would be unlikely to acquiesce in its maintenance. The SNP, in the face of this, simply asserts that they will get in with no problems.
The nationalists are also in deep water with another newly acquired policy: what currency Scotland would use post-independence. Until last year, the SNP policy was to adopt the euro. At the beginning of 2012, that changed to using the pound. When it was pointed out that our interest rates would be fixed by a foreign bank – the Bank of England – Mr Salmond announced without consultation that there would be a currency union between Scotland and the rest of the UK. This would, of course, mean a loss of sovereignty.
As we see in the eurozone, currency union members sign up to a pact that severely curtails their ability to pursue a different policy on tax, spending and borrowing. That is not freedom. Many SNP supporters now realise this. Meanwhile, for the Scottish financial-services industry, who regulates them is crucial. Here SNP policy is again contradictory. The nationalists have said the Bank of England will regulate the industry. But if we are in the EU, they also admit, Scotland must have its own separate regulator.
The uncertainty over these matters may cost Scotland dear in jobs and investment. The SNP’s preference for simply asserting what will happen is being exposed. Just last week, when confronted with the fact that green energy is hugely dependent on a UK subsidy, they simply insisted that England would carry on paying it because it would want to buy Scotland’s energy. Again, no discussion. Simply more bluster.
The Scottish Nationalist Party is asking us to buy a one-way ticket to a deeply uncertain future. There are many unknowns in the world. To which of those is independence the answer? It is hard to credit how unprepared the nationalists are to answer the fundamental questions that will define Scotland’s future for generations to come.

Read the full story here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...