Skip to main content

Tim Scott & the GOP's Reputation Deficit - Ana Marie Cox, The Guardian

Tim Scott meets with GOP base approval as Jim DeMint's successor

The South Carolina Republican congressman's appointment to the Senate is less a win for diversity than for Tea Party orthodoxy
Tim Scott Senate
Congressman Tim Scott, soon to be US Senator for South Carolina. Photograph: timscott.house.gov
When South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley appoints Representative Tim Scott to the United States Senate to fill the vacancy made by the departing Jim DeMint, it will have been 32 years since another black Republican took a seat there.
This seems like more of a cause for shame than celebration – and not just for the Republican party, but for Democrats, as well: only five other black men, and one black woman, have ever held office in the nation's upper chamber. At least the Democrats mostly elected theirs – Scott won't just be the third black Republican in the Senate from the American south, he will also be the third to get there without winning the popular vote. Hiram Revels and Blanche Bruce, both senators from Mississippi in the late 1800s, got to the Hill via election by the state senate.
That said, Scott has a decent chance of holding the seat come November 2016. He won a primary run-off in 2010 against the son of legendary Senator Strom Thurmond by 69-31 margin and has faced only token opposition in the general election (winning by 65-29 in 2010, and 62-36 in 2012). And as his ability to fundraise from outside the state – 20% of his campaign contributions in the last cycle came from outside South Carolina; Washington, DC was the third most generous metro area for him overall – shows Scott is a valuable commodity to a party struggling to remain relevant despite demographic disadvantages and an even more serious reputation deficit.
But a demographic shift among the party's elected officials won't necessarily do anything to change that reputation. Indeed, Scott's elevation to the Senate will leave the GOP without any black representatives in the House; Florida voters forcibly retired Scott's sole counterpart there, Allen West, after his two-year stint as the "congressman most likely to be compared to Joe McCarthy". Ideologically, Scott hews to the same line of here-come-the-socialists-to-steal-our-Christmas thinking that West promoted, but his more staid temperament seems to have kept him out of the spotlight. At a time when Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum are mainstream, the fact that Scott only endorsed impeaching Obama, rather than question his citizenship, puts him, if anything, on the leftward edge of the Tea Party.
They need him, of course. Right now, the Tea Party – not the GOP's narrowing center – can claim a surface diversity that its voting population as a whole lacks: along with Scott, there's Haley herself, whose parents immigrated from India; Marco Rubio and Susana Martinez serve as human counterweights to the party's immigration policy that's alienated a historic number of Latinos; insiders regularly promote Representative Cathy McMorris-Rodgers as future national ticket material.
That all these television-friendly personalities garner support from the party's far right base says less about the Tea Party's open-mindedness on diversity than its closed-mindedness on ideology. It's not that only the party's staunchest conservatives will elect minorities; it's that only staunchly conservative minorities can get support – those who are comfortably defanged of opinions that threaten the status quo.
Should Condoleezza Rice ascend in 2016 on the more moderate platform hinted at by her address to the RNC last summer, it will likely be because of the credibility she won via loyalty to the Bush administration. She comes pre-screened as non-threatening, willing to follow the most unpopular of orders.
Scott himself is nothing if not disciplined. His entry into public service stems from a "life matrix" he wrote when he was 17, a plan divided into five-year segments with the end goal "to have a positive effect on the lives of 1 billion people before he dies". His policy positions show the same kind rigidity. Whatever upstart sensibility the Tea Party claims to represent, in office Scott has served the same constituencies and lobbying interests that directed his predecessors.
Almost all of the several dozen pieces of legislation Scott has introduced catered to anti-union or pro-manufacturing groups, the same powers that have made South Carolina one of the most labor-unfriendly and environmentally reckless states in the country for decades. Indeed, if in the next few weeks, you hear a lot about Scott's support for the repeal of Obamacare or for the Paul Ryan budget, that might be because nothing else about his record has anything that defines it as being of this century.
Pouring over one set of bills Scott put forward, I thought I might have found residue of the modern era in the 28 separate items he brought to committee that would have lifted duties and tariffs from a laundry list of chemical imports: N-phenyl-p-phenylenediamine and p-Nitrobenzoic Acid and 1,2-Bis(3-aminopropyl)ethylenediamine, polymer with N-butyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinamine! Surely these newfangled mouthfuls would sound strange to Senator Thurmond, who was born before you could get pasteurized milk at the corner store.
The purpose of the chemical bills, none of which made it to the House floor, would have been familiar enough to Thurmond. They were intended to sabotage the consumer protections of the Cosmetic Safety Amendment Act, allowing manufacturers to stock up on suspect ingredients before restrictions came into effect. And it turns out the chemicals themselves weren't foreign to Thurmond, either: He spent many of his final years in the Senate trying to lift the very same penalties.
There's a postmodern poetry to the Thurmond-Scott chemical bond, and it's not just in the symmetry of suffixes (-ide-mine-tyl-zoic!). Both men championed substances used as "optical whiteners", a flourish even Ralph Ellison might have found overly literal, if apt. As a character in Ellison's Invisible Man says of a similar product, "That's paint that will cover just about anything."

Read the full story here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo

Mir Chakar Khan Rind - A Warrior Hero Of Baluchistan & Punjab Provinces of Pakistan

By Sikander Hayat The areas comprising the state of Pakistan have a rich history and are steeped in the traditions of martial kind. Tribes which are the foundation stone of Pakistan come from all ethnic groups of Pakistan either they be Sindhi, Balochi, Pathan or Punjabi. One of these men of war & honour were Mir Chakar Khan Rind. He is probably the most famous leader coming out of Baloch ethnic group of Pakistan. Mir Chakar Khan Rind or Chakar-i-Azam (1468 – 1565 ) was a Baloch king and ruler of Satghara in (Southern Pakistani Punjab) in the 15th century. He is considered a folk hero of the Baloch people and an important figure in the Baloch epic Hani and Sheh Mureed. Mir Chakar lived in Sibi in the hills of Balochistan and became the head of Rind tribe at the age of 18 after the death of his father Mir Shahak Khan. Mir Chakar's kingdom was short lived because of a civil war between the Lashari and Rind tribes of Balochistan. Mir Chakar and Mir Gwaharam Khan Lashari, hea