Skip to main content

US Immigration Problem & The Dream Act


WASHINGTON -- Nearly 600 would-be Dream Act beneficiaries and their allies, who helped in a successful push earlier this year for relief for undocumented young people, gathered in Kansas City, Mo., this weekend to determine their path forward.
They settled on a new priority: comprehensive immigration reform that would help the entire undocumented population, not just those who came to the United States as children.
It's something of a shift for the network, United We Dream, which is made up of smaller groups of undocumented young people nationwide. Although the network has always supported comprehensive reform, its primary focus has been on so-called Dreamers, who came to the United States as children and would be eligible for the Dream Act, a decade-old bill to give legal status to some of those individuals if they attended college or joined the military.
After what they see as two major victories for their effort -- President Barack Obama's June announcement that his administration would grant deferred immigration action on some undocumented young people, and the victory of pro-immigration reform politicians in the November election -- the group is expanding its goals.
"[Comprehensive immigration reform] versus the Dream Act, or comprehensive versus piecemeal, is really a false choice," United We Dream managing director Cristina Jimenez said on a call with reporters Monday. "That's the way that politicians in D.C. want to frame this debate, but the local leaders of United We Dream have really decided to set our own terms for this debate."
There's support for comprehensive immigration reform from the highest levels of the political spectrum, but it will be a difficult sell farther down the line. Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) have said major reform will be a priority after the president begins his second term in January. Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) have already begun bipartisan talks.
House Republicans, though, largely oppose comprehensive immigration reform that gives pathways to citizenship to undocumented immigrants already in the country. Many also argue that a piece-by-piece reform effort is a better path forward.
Dreamers won't accept a piecemeal approach, United We Dream members said. They want aid for undocumented immigrants in general, and more specific provisions that address driver's licenses, college tuition and health care for immigrants. They said they will also push for an end to Obama administration-run enforcement programs such as Secure Communities that they say are damaging to the immigrant community.
Lorella Praeli, United We Dream director of advocacy and policy, said on the call that the group expects Boehner to lead the House GOP's effort for comprehensive immigration reform in the House, assisted by Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.). Reps. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) and Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) will also be integral to reform efforts, she said.
She added that other Republicans should come around to support immigration reform after seeing the importance of the Latino vote in the presidential election, which was partially influenced by immigration policies and rhetoric.
"We hope that Republicans have learned that voting to kill the Dream Act and promoting 'self-deportation' ensured their political downfall in 2012," Praeli said.
Current Republican proposals on immigration are too narrow to win the group's support, she said. Republican Sens. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) and Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) introduced the Achieve Act last week that would help Dreamers but would not give a pathway to citizenship, while the House passed the STEM Jobs Act to give green cards to foreign graduates with advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Republicans did not reach out to anyone in the United We Dream network about either piece of legislation, Praeli said.
"We find that these are just cynical gestures at the moment, and there isn't true commitment to work on real change and policies that reflect the values and principles of our communities," she said.

Read the original story here.

Comments

  1. Trump has asked Mexico that if they don't take care of drug gangs, he will invade Mexico.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Donald Trump has said that if there is any terrorist attack in United States, than the judges have given a stay order on Trump's Muslim ban will be responsible.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for leaving comments. You are making this discussion richer and more beneficial to everyone. Do not hold back.

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...