Skip to main content

Will Biden's America Start New Wars?


By Sikander Hayat

Under President Trump, the United States of America did not invade any country. On the contrary, the US army started drawing down its operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria along with other engagements around the world. Afghanistan saw the biggest drawdown with now only 2500 troops in Afghanistan.  The big question now is if the Biden Presidency will go back to previous years and start again the policy of invading far away places to help cement its imperial role which was reversed by Trump’s America first policy




Mr Biden supported the Iraq invasion by voting for the war and by supporting President Bush. When Mr Biden was a vice president to President Barack Obama, he supported increasing troop numbers in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Clearly, there is a tendency where Mr Biden tilts in favour of foreign wars


If there was one good policy pursued by President Trump, that was to stop engaging in foreign wars and concentrate on America and Americans. If covid had not hit the economy as badly as it eventually ended up doing, Mr Trump would still be the President.  





America needs to redefine its role in the world from being a hegemon and a global policeman to a country which wants to cooperate with other countries and play a positive role in reaching consensus. Failure in Iraq (which the US has now effectively handed over to Iran) and Afghanistan (which is soon going back to the bad old days of pre Taliban internal conflict) has shown limits of American power. America can no longer kill and destroy its way to victory in the age of information where news travels fast and consequences of bad actions are swift. 




A suitable piece of advice for Mr Biden is to cooperate with the world at large and forge a new American role in the world. There are always scenarios where war seems like the only option but in the long run, patience and using soft power may achieve more for American State than being a global bully. The United States can be a source of great good and moral authority without engaging in armed conflicts. 





No doubt there will be challenges and two obvious ones being China & Russia. Dealing with these two geopolitical and economic powers (China) will define the Biden presidency. Taiwan is always an outstanding issue with Russia (having captured Crimea and parts of Eastern Ukraine, Georgia and other parts of the old Soviet Union) increasingly playing the role of a spoiler all around the world. 


The bigger question is if these problems are America’s problems. This is where Trump was different from past and maybe future presidents of America. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...