Skip to main content

What is Financial Crime Guide (FCG) - A Document By The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) of UK


FCG provides practical assistance and information for firms of all sizes and across all FCA-supervised sectors on actions they can take to counter the risk that they might be used to further financial crime. Its contents are drawn primarily from FCA and FSA thematic reviews, with some additional material
included to reflect other aspects of our financial crime remit. Effective systems and controls can help firms to detect, prevent and deter financial crime. FCG provides guidance on financial crime systems and
controls, both generally and in relation to specific risks such as money laundering, bribery and corruption and fraud. Annexed to FCG is a list of common and useful terms. ■ FCG Annex 1 is provided for reference purposes only and is not a list of ‘defined terms’.
Where a word or phrase is in italics,
its definition will be the one used for that word or phrase in the Glossary to the FCA Handbook. FCTR provides summaries of, and links to, FSA (now the FCA) thematic reviews of various financial crime risks and sets out the full examples of good and poor practice that were included with the reviews’ findings.


We will keep FCG under review and will continue to update it to reflect the findings of future thematic reviews, enforcement actions and other FCA publications and to cover emerging risks and concerns.
The material in FCG does not form part of the Handbook, but it does contain guidance on Handbook rules and principles, particularly: •■ SYSC 3.2.6R and ■ SYSC 6.1.1R, which require firms to establish and
maintain effective systems and controls to counter the risk that they might be used to further financial crime; •Principles 1 (integrity), 2 (skill, care and diligence), 3 (management and control) and 11 (relations with regulators) of our Principles for Businesses, which are set out in ■ PRIN 2.1.1R; •the Statements of Principle for Approved Persons set out in ■ APER 2.1A.3R and the conduct rules set out in ■ COCON 2.1 and ■ 2.2; and •in relation to guidance on money laundering, the rules in ■ SYSC 3.2.6 to ■ SYSC 3.2.6 IR
and ■ SYSC 6.3 (Financial crime). Where FCG refers to guidance in relation to SYSC requirements, this may also be relevant to compliance with the corresponding Principle in our Principles for Businesses and corresponding requirements in the Payment Services Regulations and the Electronic Money Regulations. Direct references in FCG to requirements set out in our rules or other legal provisions include a cross reference to the relevant provision. FCG contains ‘general guidance’ as defined in section 139B of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA). The guidance is not binding and we


will not presume that a firm’s departure from our guidance indicates that it has breached our rules.
Our focus, when supervising firms, is on whether they are complying with our rules and their other legal obligations. Firms can comply with their financial crime obligations in ways other than following the good practice set out in FCG. But we expect firms to be aware of what we say where it applies to them and to consider applicable guidance when establishing, implementing and maintaining their anti-financial crime systems and controls. More information about FCA guidance and its status can be found in our Reader’s Guide: an introduction to the Handbook; ■ DEPP 6.2.1G(4) and ■ EG 2.9.1G – ■ 2.9.6G.
FCG also contains guidance on how firms can meet the requirements of the Money Laundering Regulations and the EU Funds Transfer Regulation. While the relevant parts of the guide that refer to the Money Laundering

Regulations may be ‘relevant guidance’ under these regulations, it is not approved by HM Treasury.
The Joint Money Laundering Steering Group’s (JMLSG) guidance for the UK financial sector on the prevention of money laundering and combating terrorist financing is ‘relevant guidance’ and is approved by HM Treasury under the Money Laundering Regulations. As confirmed in ■ DEPP 6.2.3G, ■ EG 12.1.2G and ■ EG 19.15.5G, the FCA will continue to have regard to whether firms have followed the relevant provisions of JMLSG’s guidance when deciding whether conduct amounts to a breach of relevant
requirements. FCG is not a standalone document; it does not attempt to set out all applicable requirements and should be read in conjunction with existing laws, rules and guidance on financial crime. If there is a discrepancy between FCG and any applicable legal requirements, the provisions of the relevant
requirement prevail. If firms have any doubt about a legal or other provision or their responsibilities under FSMA or other relevant legislation or requirements, they should seek appropriate professional advice. 


Related Posts: 





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Siege - A Poem By Ahmad Faraz Against The Dictatorship Of Zia Ul Haq

Related Posts: 1.  Did Muhammad Ali Jinnah Want Pakistan To Be A Theocracy Or A Secular State? 2. The Relationship Between Khadim & Makhdoom In Pakistan 3. Battle for God; Battleground Pakistan - a time has finally come to call a spade a spade 4. Pakistan - Facing Contradictory Strategic Choices In An Uncertain Region 5. Pakistan, Islamic Terror & General Zia-Ul-Haq 6. Why Pakistan Army Must Allow The Democracy To Flourish In Pakistan & Why Pakistanis Must Give Democracy A Chance? 7. A new social contract in Pakistan between the Pakistani Federation and its components 8. Birth of Bangladesh / Secession of East Pakistan & The Sins of Our Fathers 9. Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ? 10. Balochistan - Troubles Of A Demographic Nature

India: The Terrorists Within

A day after major Indian cities were placed on high alert following blasts in the IT city of Bangalore, as many as 17 blasts ripped through Ahmedabad, capital of the affluent western Indian state of Gujarat . Some 30 people were killed, some at hospitals where bombs were timed to go off when the injured from other blasts were being brought in. (Later, in Surat, a center for the world's diamond industry, a bomb was defused near a hospital and two cars packed with explosives were found in in the city's outskirts.) Investigators pointed fingers at the usual Islamist suspects: Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), Bangladesh- based Harkat-ul Jihadi Islami (HUJI) and the indigenous Students' Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). But even as the police searched for clues, the Ahmedabad attacks were owned up by a group calling itself the " Indian Mujahideen. " Several TV news stations received an email five minutes before the first blasts in Ahmedabad. The message repo...

Pakistan Army Must Not Intervene In The Current Crisis - Who To Blame For the Present Crisis in Pakistan ?

By Sikander Hayat Another day of agony and despair as Pakistanis live through a period of uncertainty but still I believe that army must not intervene in this crisis. These are the kind of circumstances when army need to show their resolve of not meddling in the political sphere of the country. No doubt that there will be people in the corridors of power and beyond who will be urging the army to step in and ‘save’ the country but let me tell you that country will only be saved if army stays away and let the politicians decide the future of the country, even if it means that there will be clashes on the streets of Islamabad. With free media in place, people are watching with open eyes the parts being played by each and every individual in this current saga. They know who is right and who is wrong and they will eventually decide who stays in power when the next general election comes. Who said that democracy was and orderly and pretty business ; it is anything but. Democracy ...